• Gaim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe, just maybe keep them on like… all the time? Wild idea, I know!

    Should make turning bodycams off a criminal offense.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would be fine with them being off for bathroom breaks and lunch. I am good with only requiring them to be on during calls, but then also assuming the officer did whatever someone says they did if the camera is not on to support the officer. Treat it as protecting the officer and it will be on to protect the public.

  • Cornpop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    Always on. Simple as that. Have a little magnetic charger that sticks on it to keep it charged up while in the car, pops off by itself when you get out.

      • Happenchance@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Always on means always accountable.

        Oh look at that chunk of missing video from Officer Piggins, that’s a fine, probation and an audit.

      • deur@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In this theoretical scenario I think they’d be told to “forget” to come into work tomorrow (or ever again) ;P

        Police with standards, though? Maybe not in the United States.

    • Adalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fuck that, install them with local area wireless chargers.

      https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2017/2/20/14668478/the-motherbox-truly-wireless-charging-indiegogo

      They are not perfect, but could be perfected with funding and more engineering talent dealing with it. But with this, the charging antenna could be embedded in the console between the seats and the cameras charged by virtue of existing in proximity. No need to take them off, no need to turn them off, no way to prevent them from being fully charged and on without tampering that js obvious. You would have to put them or the antenna in a Faraday cage to prevent them from charging.

    • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I once got downvoted to oblivion on Reddit for saying I’d rather some person have to see a cops dick out when they piss (through video) than see another case where a cop turns his bodycam off during an encounter.

      They should never be turned off and I agree it should be instant prison time no questions asked.

      • bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nothing should be instant prison time no questions asked. That’s not justice that’s vengeance.

              • bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Do you want to improve things, or just get vengeance? Your mindset is the same mindset that got us in this situation, it’s the same mindset that has been used to allow things like that to happen.

                • Nutteman@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Incorrect and wrong and also I am stronger than you and could beat you in a fight

              • Doug Holland@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Even the very worst bad guys, even if they’re cops, deserve a fair trial, and a safe stay at a non-barbarous prison with a chance for rehabilitation.

        • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          See the difference is we’re supposed to hold these people to higher standards. If they fuck up the punishment should be more extreme and their actions should be heavily scrutinized. If they can kill someone with little to no evidence they should be just as susceptible to losing everything with even the slightest fuck up.

          • bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You have to take the emotion out of it when making decisions like that. If you don’t, you end up in the exact same spot

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        As long as there is a 3rd party review process to filter out background people in restrooms and other sensitive areas to avoid getting random people in trouble because a cop was present with a camera on.

        You know, like a 10 year old using a urinal.

    • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Off or purposely blocked by their hand for more time than can be considered a reasonable accident should be a crime and immediate ban from law enforcement for life.

    • Username02@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      True. Cops don’t poop. It’s common knowledge. We all know that. So why is the option to turn off the cam even there?

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Who the fuck cares if we have audio of cops taking a devastating shit when the alternative is then getting away with literal murder.

        • Username02@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          I just want to humor the absurdity in that guy’s comment. Careless statement deserves to be humor carelessly is all.

          • Krafty@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The true absurdity here is American law enforcement. If they aren’t killing people unnecessarily, they are running from school shooters and allowing kids to be slaughtered.

            Fuck the police.

  • Nutteman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Thank you for your consideration, sherriff”

    gets shot 3 times in chest and once in the head off-camera

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gee, ya think?

    Taking bets on how many assaults/murders by police will happen between now and the time this idea is officially shot down.