aidan@lemmy.worldM to politics @lemmy.world · edit-21 month agoEurope's free-speech problemarchive.isexternal-linkmessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up13
arrow-up13external-linkEurope's free-speech problemarchive.isaidan@lemmy.worldM to politics @lemmy.world · edit-21 month agomessage-square15linkfedilink
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoBut people act violently without it, I don’t think the rhetoric is a necessary precursor. Furthermore, practicality is not what defines freedom of speech.
minus-squareIt'sbetterwithbutter@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·30 days agoSure people act violently, it’s in our nature, but when a “revered” figure calls for violence, it’s more than likely many more people will act on it.
But people act violently without it, I don’t think the rhetoric is a necessary precursor. Furthermore, practicality is not what defines freedom of speech.
Sure people act violently, it’s in our nature, but when a “revered” figure calls for violence, it’s more than likely many more people will act on it.
Probably