Mods
Actions
- Removed posters comments
- Banned posters from community
Mod log
- Original comment that was deleted with reason of āTankie apologiaā.
- When another user comments has suspicions of mods actions, Mod replies with this.
- Poster replies in exasperation explaining perspective, rationale, and offline experiences. Comment gets deleted and purged.
Explanation
The original comment I made was stating that alienation of someone by frustrating their political beliefs is not a way to convince them of anything.
That being their genuine friend goes a long way in helping someone rather then attacking them.
That together they both can work together for a better future.
That you can be annoyed, but that should be swallowed because that is what it means to be part of a community.
You will always be annoyed one way or another in a community, that is the beauty of a community, that there are different people that may annoy you slightly, but working together to still be a community.
The moderator disagrees with this, viewing it as ātankie apologiaā.
When I replied, explaining why I made my post and my background, My post was removed and I was banned from the community.
Thank you @[email protected] for reminding me on this missing context: https://lemmy.ml/comment/17251624
In my reply post, I wrote that āadvocating for war on any country is not political flavoringā.
That cannot be swallowed, and one should not befriend such a person without sufficient care for ones own wellbeing.
I had wrote explicitly thinking of people who suport Russia against Ukraine, Israel over Palestine, and Assadists etc.
My purged comment also states that āpeople seeking to punish / attack LGBTQIA+ people is not political flavoringā.
I whole heartingly believe trans rights are human rights.
Free HRT and gender affirming care for all!
To remove an otherwise popular comment advocating for support what I feel are healthy behaviors, then name call someone as a āauthoritarianā and a ātankie apologistā is disingenuous and corrupt to me.
Remedy
Personally I would like my comments restored so at least others see a different way of looking at things. I have no qualms with remaining banned.
Perhaps I should have not commented in reply to the mod, but they had already removed my post and I had little to lose.
Otherwise, I am very tired of this on the internet, I am tired of tribalism and the lack of empathy in this world.
What do you all think, should I have even made my original comment if I already knew it would be fruitless?
Immediately likening the political compass to PCM sounds like a you problem.
Itās not perfect but itās infinitely more accurate than boiling stances down to āleftā and āright.ā Which I assume is the goal so you can paint any criticism of tankies as āleftist infighting.ā It isnāt. Go be a tankie somewhere else.
Sorry, Iām not familiar with that acronym, what does āPCMā stand for?
No it isnāt. It was invented by right-wing libertarians to promote their ideology. For the record, I test in the bottom left quadrant, like a -9 on the authoritarian-libertarian scale, like any other normal person.
Itās complete nonsense and views politics through a purely idealist lens, ignoring materialist analysis. āRight libertarianismā doesnāt exist, because capitalists will just seize power and create/take over the state to pursue their own interests. āLeft-libertariansā are either armchair idealists or aspiring martyrs.
In a world where people like Mohammad Mossadegh and Jacobo Arbenz didnāt get couped, Iād be happy to be a āleft-libertarian.ā In fact, I was before studying examples like those. But Iām sure you have no idea who those people are since your politics come from memes.
No.
Claiming to not be authoritarian while also accepting the tankie label is a bold strategy.
I didnāt say that. Everyone gets libertarian on the political compass test unless they just randomly hate gay people. Stating that I get Libertarian on the political compass test is not some claim to being Libertarian. Every single ātankieā or Marxist-Leninist I know tests Libertarian, because itās a very stupid test for a very stupid model.
Libertarian vs authoritarian is not a useful dimension for understanding politics. Like everyone else, Iām a ālibertarianā while Iām out of power and an āauthoritarianā while in power, the only difference is that Iām honest enough to admit it.
āAuthoritarianā just means the government doing stuff you donāt like. And the average anti-tankie āleftistā doesnāt like any leftist project that doesnāt immediately deliver a perfect utopia - happily accepting the capitalist status quo as a ālesser evilā over trying to improve society somewhat.
I support direct action, unionization, and revolution, I just donāt also support states that suppress unions, like you do. Improving society somewhat doesnāt look like implementing a military dictatorship.
You canāt support hierarchical dictatorships that take away the rights of workers and call yourself a communist, leftist, etc. etc. You are an authoritarian even now with no power.
so you support every revolution except for the successful ones?
life is not a map painting game
Two questions:
Were Marx and Engles communists?
Have you read āOn Authorityā by Engles?
On authority : notoriously the worst Marxist essay ever written.
What you think of it is irrelevant. Whatās relevant is that it plainly demonstrates the authorās perspective on this issue. Meaning that anyone who claims āYou canāt call yourself a communist if youāre an authoritarianā has to either make the absurd claim that Engles wasnāt a communist or pretend the essay doesnāt exist.
Of course, On Authority is just the shortest and most to the point work demonstrating the view in a way that is completely impossible to deny. If you (God forbid) read Lenin (particularly The State and Revolution), he cites Marx extensively to defend his position and refute the idea that Marx didnāt support the use of āauthoritarianā state power.
Whatās funny to me is that for all the time Lenin spent refuting these ideas in his time, the people saying them today donāt actually read any of the people whose intellectual tradition theyāre inheriting. The modern day Kautskist wonāt read Lenin, but they certainly wonāt read Kautsky. Thereās no theory to even be critiqued really, itās just memes, streamers, and recycled propaganda lines.
Or, hear me out here, that Engels was just fractally wrong .
Lol
Why do you cling to the words of old dead men
āIām only an authoritarian when Iām in powerā
Yeah, thatās why Iām not going to ally with you to help you get power, genius.
And again, youāre not denying the tankie label. I assume you know the etymology of the phrase if youāre as well read as you pretend to be, so sincerely, fuck you.
So youāll get a different āauthoritarian,ā an authoritarian who serves the bourgeoisie. Or, you somehow manage to get a ālibertarianā in power, and then they lose power to an authoritarian who serves the bourgeoisie, like what happens every time itās been tried.
(The Jakarta Method)
To prove me wrong, point to any historical ālibertarianā leftist project that you consider successful.
Oh really? Does it? Thatās a convenient definition.
If you think Russia is heading in the direction of less authoritarianism and more communism then I hate to break it to you, but the exact opposite is happening. It failed to deliver an immediate utopia. It failed to deliver a medium-term utopia. And it seems like in the long run this war will result in a complete collapse of the Russian economy. But Iām sure theyāll get there one of these days.
I think what the average anti-tankie leftist doesnāt like is the idea that we should replace one bunch of power hungry authoritarians with another bunch of power hungry authoritarians flying a different flag, but doing more or less the same shit.
Then provide your own.
Iām not sure what gave you the impression that I think this. Iām quite sure that Iāve never said anything that suggests that would be the case.