He said speaking up during the address was the best way “get across to a person who uses his incivility, who uses his incivility against our civility.”

  • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not saying I disagree with your premise.

    However, there are some strange brew rules that come into play depending on the #of reps in attendance in the house. You dwindle the dem #s enough and you end up allowing the reps the ability to run amok with the kinds of legislation they’re salivating to pass.

    I’m sure this was at top of mind for some of the folks in attendance.

    • BigFig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Congressional rules are meaningless. They are not the constitution. If the Democrats are going to just sit idle because of “congressional rules” then they might as well start using the constitution as toilet paper

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You dwindle the dem #s enough and you end up allowing the reps the ability to run amok with the kinds of legislation they’re salivating to pass.

      That’s why there’s also quorum rules. There has to be a minimum of X% of the congresspeople present for anything to count and I’m 99.9% certain that all of the Dems leaving would bring the number present under that even if every single Republican was present.