• rayon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think most people (including myself) prefer a minimal desktop by default, and then proceed to install only the software they need. Nevertheless, it always surprises me when I log in to a system that doesn’t have vim.

    • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For almost all users, especially beginners, nano is just simpler faster and better. A lot of distributions are bundling it, and I am finding indeed systems without vim at all.

        • Yuumi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          Man I tried to use vi once because I started with vim and wanted to see what all it was before, and holy shit vim really is IMPROVED

        • CloverSi@lemmy.comfysnug.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m surprised there aren’t more distros that come packaged with it. If someone’s used a graphical text editor in the past decade, then they know how to use micro. The only distro I know of that has it by default is Garuda.

    • s20@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I disagree. Don’t get me wrong, vim is amazing and all that, but I think nano is easier for new users to grok out of the box, making it a better choice most of the time. What it lacks in features it makes up for in transparency.

      100% agree about the minimal set of desktop apps, though. That drives me crazy.

      Just my 0.02$.

      Edit: silly mistakes and clarification