Disclaimer: Fuck the rich and please consider reading 1 paragraph before you go to comments to explain how I am a bootlicker. Thank you ٩(•͈ ꇴ •͈)و ̑̑❀

For context, I generally report all calls to violence, no matter who the “victim” is, whether they are a public figure or an anonymous user. I didn’t even register that the person I was “defending” was rich—I’m just aware that calls to violence are against most instances’ terms of service (due to legal threats). Genuinely sorry seahorse! I wish you just had something in your instance sidebar or even spoke to me instead of jumping to ban and “lib” insults!

Unverifiable information you will have to take my word for (per community rules)

Apologized to seahorse and got:

My own personal curiosities only adjacently related

Correct me if I’m wrong, isn’t this a bit of an abuse of federation? This is the same admin that pulled the move with the doxxing of Nick Fuentes. By banning users for reporting content that may violate our local instance rules, seahorse is making our local instances harder to moderate for our admins. (Honestly I respect the commitment to the running a very open and uncensored instance, but until Lemmy has the option to only report to local admins versus local & federated authorities, this may not be the best strategy?)

Anyway, this is pretty interesting. I’m honestly not too pressed about this (mostly I will miss [email protected]) and curious what yall think. :)

  • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    [email protected]

    Probably worth boycotting the main onion community and using this secondary one.

    the secondary one was made in the past in response to shitty moderation on midwest.social affecting their onion community, so this isn’t a one time thing, it’s a patterm.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    It really feels like the mod tools of lemmy need to be a bit more fine grained. A button to ignore all further reports from a person would have gone a long way here.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      as an admin, what would you think about separate buttons to report to local mods versus the mods of the community’s host instance?

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        I think that would be a very good feature, Also I honestly think Federated reports should have user-data stripped out of them. Just like on Mastodon, it prevents harassment and abuse from malicious remote servers towards the users who reported the content. Probably also don’t show it to community mods, I was abused and harassed relentlessly by a malicious community mod who used my reports as fuel for more abusive behavior.

        i.e. Instead of a report coming from me on this server, you’d see it as from lemmy.dbzer0.com, and for mods on the same server it would say “local user report” but still show the name to admins.

        Admins could configure if local mods could see report names but remote mods and remote server admins would just see domain name.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Usually if numerous frivolous reports were getting on someone’s nerves they would warn you first. I’m guessing there was a big backlog to clear around certain comments. Thanks for making reports, even if I wouldn’t completely agree with the threshold you use, personally.

    “Libbity lib lib…” is a non-reason for a community ban, the admin in question would be better off being honest and just ban you from the instance with the reason “i’m tired of getting your stupid reports”, and be done with it.

    It’s fine for an admin to run things the way they want, but handling it in this unclear way reflects poorly on them, and the silly reason just shows how much someone can be stuck up their own ass.

    • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      The “honest reason” is that the moderator in question disagrees with OP.

      The moderator believes that the wealthy should be punished corporally for the catastrophic harm they have inflicted upon humanity for generations through their parasitism and believes that it is morally right to champion such punishment.

      OP has demonstrated the position that calling for this punishment is morally wrong.

      This was an impasse.

      The moderator decided that opinions such as OP’s are not welcome there, and therefore chose to remove OP.

      We’re not going to find detached impassive professionalism or even-handedness here, no matter how hard we dig for it. It’s just politically motivated suppression of opposed opinions through and through.

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        I get that and I agree that that could be the admin’s intent. Admins can have opinions and operate their server based on them. What reflects poorly on this admin is how they handle it immaturely in a hexbearish fashion, when the same opinion can be expressed a lot more clearly.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Okay, that listed reason is so five-year-old-on-a-sugar-high that I ain’t even mad. Like, it goes beyond power tripping into comedy via absurdity.

    However, if you’re running around playing playground monitor, I can’t say I blame them. Report abuse is a thing, and depending on how far you’re taking it, it could well be absurdist as well

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Obviously I didn’t keep count but I can’t have made more than maybe 1-3 reports in the last day? Believe me I hear you though! That’s why I was so apologetic to him and reached out before posting here. I hate to he a nuisance and genuinely just try to help people out haha.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        That’s not much, imo. Certainly not nuisance or troll levels at all. Hell, I don’t think I would even notice that many considering that word of mouth has most instances generating at least dozens of reports a day. Not that word of mouth is exactly reliable, but as a rough guesstimate of things, someone making good faith reports at that frequency is nothing.

        For damn sure it would merit a “bugger off” before even a temp ban

        • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          I invite anyone reading this comment to time themselves on how long it takes to DM me “chill with the reports or ban” and report back

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Seconds.

            I’ve had a mod DM me in reply to a report exactly once (and they replied to my reply, so maybe twice). It’s not difficult for them.

            • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              I have had mods do it probably half a dozen times from various communities. A couple were to say thanks, some were to ask for clarification on why I reported. One instance I was reporting every single abusive comment of a user who had gone under the radar for weeks and they were just like “yo you can stop reporting we are working on it.” 😅

              All of those times I was grateful for the open and candid communication.