Summary

Democratic strategist Chai Komanduri claims Elon Musk has “taken over” MAGA and the Republican Party, likening it to how Trump originally took control of the GOP.

Musk, a former Biden supporter, shifted to Republicans over disagreements on free speech, immigration, and public health.

Now a close Trump ally, Musk has donated $75 million to pro-Trump groups and will co-lead the “Department of Government Efficiency” to reduce government waste.

His rising influence in GOP politics is seen as positioning him as a potential MAGA successor.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    185
    ·
    22 days ago

    Don’t worry everyone, i’ve worked for rich guys and I can assure you that two rich people are absolutely incapable of working together for more than a few months.

    Trump and Musk are going to turn on one another, it’s only a matter of time

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      22 days ago

      hopefully they just bitch slap each other for four years and nothing of consequence actually gets implemented.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Nah, if Musk pisses off Trump he loses hard and fast. Trump could easily get away with making it an official act to strip Musk of all his wealth and instead of turning it over to the state, turn it over to the GOP. Use the guise that it is not communist because they are turning it over to a private company, not the government and it was all done for security reasons after Musk commited treason in dealings with Putin.

        The GOP controls the house and Senate, so they wouldn’t vote for impeachment, it checks the boxes for being pro capitalism, and anti Russia. And they make buckets off of him. The penalty they set for his Treason, execution. To show they are hard on crime and believe in the death penalty.

        Doubt they would even need to fabricate any evidence, it is already there.

        • jrs100000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          No expropriation necessary. All hes got to do is knock out Tesla’s subsidies and SpaceX’s government contracts…maybe have the DOT and FAA take a reeaaal close look at their safety records just to put the final nail in their coffins. Trump is petty though, my bingo card say he also threatens to strip him of his citizenship and have him deported before this is all over.

          • shuzuko@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            22 days ago

            The day he deports musk will be the only day I ever wholeheartedly support something cheeto mussolini does.

            • jrs100000@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              22 days ago

              I doubt he would actually be able to do it. Even if he had a solid case, Musk has the money to drag this through the courts until long after Trump is gone. However, Im pretty sure hell make a big show of the threat when they inevitably have their falling out.

              • toddestan@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                21 days ago

                If Trump wanted to deport Musk, he’d just do it. It’s not like the courts have ever stopped Trump from doing whatever he wants.

                • jrs100000@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  21 days ago

                  What? No, they stopped him all the time. They never hold him accountable, but they stopped all sorts of crazy shit.

              • GraniteM@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 days ago

                Trump makes it an “official act” to send the Army division of his choice to Musk’s mansion, battering ram the door down, throw him in the back of the nearest C-17, and drop him naked at the gate of Camp Lemonnier.

                  • mriguy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    21 days ago

                    Or without one. SCOTUS already ruled that Trump just has to say “official act” and there is literally nothing he can be held accountable for.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          Use the TikTok ban on Xitter. There’s no judicial process or appeal, and the evidence is a state secret that they don’t have to show anyone.(TikTok is contesting the law itself right now, if they lose then it’s going to be very hard for social media to get out from under that law)

          It would be the height of irony.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 days ago

            The ban is on foreign ownership of media being spread to our population. So long as the majority owner is Musk, it’s legal unless he was deported.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              Oh no. People massively misunderstand this point. It doesn’t have to be a foreign owner. It has a catch all in the definition of “Controlled by a Foreign Adversary”. (link)

              © a person subject to the direction or control of a foreign person or entity described in subparagraph (A) or (B).

              And the evidence is classified. This is literally where they can point at someone and claim they are controlled by Putin or Xi and there’s nothing you can do but try to get the law declared unconstitutional again.

              Edit - because I realize the Congress page isn’t updated for some reason, if you want to find the actual law as passed, it’s Public Law 118-50. The section I reference is absolutely still in there. Even the wiki misses this crucial part of the definition.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      22 days ago

      IMHO this is just hopium.

      There’s no indication that they will not work together since they need each other for their own separate selfish reasons.

      They will use each other as long as goals have not been met.

      When those goals are met then they will have a falling out. And at that point it’s too late for the rest of us.

      • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 days ago

        Also both clearly report to Putin, so likely he told them to work together. And each of them is getting something out of it (for Musk, I assume nobody will look more deeply into his companies anymore, which are known to break all manner of regulations).

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      Rich people have absolutely worked together in the past. Your theory only works until suddenly it doesn’t and we have a big ass threat to deal with.

      • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        21 days ago

        We already have a “big ass threat” it’s the Christo-fascists on the supreme court, the wingnut lower court judges, and all the dark money being funneled to groups like Mom’s for Liberty who’re burning books.

        Musk and Trump are just symptoms of this “big ass threat” and the DNC have been slow rolling their response because they’re fat on the same dark money.

        We’re in an autocracy. And there’s a lot of work to get out of it.

          • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            I’m saying "yes and… " here. The point of my argument is that merely being rich, regardless of political affiliation, is contributing to the autocracy. Even when they’re at odds. They’re still paying into a system that benefits them.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 days ago

              My point is they may have interpersonal issues but they all very much understand why they donate to the Heritage Foundation and Federalist Society.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      The hyaenas are airway at each others’ throats. It’ll at least provide some entertainment throughout this whole mess.