• azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I didn’t even know disliking moths was a thing until recently.

    Guess why? In French they are called “night butterflies”. It’s just a nocturnal butterfly so of course it’s brown, duh.

    This feels like the Orca/Killer Whale debate again. Why do the English give such terrible names to animals like they’re trying to give children nightmares?

    • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      What do mean regarding terrible names? “Moth” isn’t inherently a bad name; any negative connotations of the word come from the creature itself.

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        The phonology of “moth” is just bad (not just subjectively but in a way that I’m sure linguists could pick apart). It’s adjacent to “moist”. That’s the kind of name you give something you don’t like, a name made to be spat out. Contrast to other monosyllabic names like “fly”, a decidedly more despicable insect but with a much prettier name. Which one would be easier to use in a song?

        Also I just checked and moths are butterflies, etymologically it’s just that old Germanic peoples assigned a different name to the less colorful butterflies.