Two historians have said that the Democratic Party was wrong to overlook Bernie Sanders' policies for working class people.

Summary

Historians suggest Democrats might have fared better against Donald Trump by embracing the economic issues championed by Senator Bernie Sanders, who has long pushed for a focus on “bread-and-butter” concerns for working-class voters.

Despite Kamala Harris’s progressive policies, polls showed Trump was favored on economic issues, particularly among working-class and Hispanic voters.

Historian Leah Wright Rigueur argued that Sanders’ messaging on economic struggles could be key for future Democratic strategies.

Sanders himself criticized the party for “abandoning” the working class, which he said has led to a loss of support across racial lines.

  • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
    6·
    1 month ago

    Funny when it was the more neoliberal, pro-business dems that shot it down, shortly before leaving the democratic party.

    Shot it down? The bill passed in 2022 after being modified to hell by special interest.

    There’s really not a whole lot of corporate profits to be found in here, though

    If it’s not going to be implemented directly by the state it means that it’s going to be implemented by private businesses. Those private business owners are going to walk away with the lion’s share of any money they accept from the government.

    It actually raised corporate taxes, which is not a neoliberal policy position:

    It’s almost like corporations aren’t a monolith of mutual aid and support. You don’t think Raytheon wouldn’t support raising some taxes if it meant they could funnel a ton of government funding towards the privatized military industrial sector?

    • Carrolade@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      1 month ago

      No, that is a false claim. It was not passed by the Senate and never became law. We can certainly criticize our neoliberal factions, but we should do it factually instead of weaving whatever narratives we find most convenient. Unless you’re confusing it with the Infrastructure bill, which did pass. They were linked at one time, but were separated after both failing became likely.

      https://ballotpedia.org/Build_Back_Better_Act

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
        4·
        1 month ago

        My dude… The inflation reduction act is an amended version of the build back better deal. What are you talking about?

        On July 27, Manchin and Schumer announced the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, the final result of these negotiations, surprising other congressional Democrats.[192] The bill, which includes provisions on tax, health care, and climate and energy spending, was introduced in the Senate as an amendment to the Build Back Better Act. On August 7, the Senate passed the bill on a 50–50 vote with Vice President Harris breaking the tie.[193] On August 12, 2022, the House passed the bill on a 220–207 vote.[194] President Biden signed it into law on August 16.[195]

        • Carrolade@lemmy.worldEnglish
          3·
          1 month ago

          Fine, technically true I suppose. But when you gut something that comprehensively and change its thrust, I think it’s a little disingenuous to call it the same thing. It had all the workers rights stuff stripped out of it.

          edit: Disingenuous on the bill author’s part, not yours. Though tbf, they did rename it.