Edit First vote is in! Dixville Notch, New Hampshire!

Tie Vote 3-3!

https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/05/politics/dixville-notch-new-hampshire-2024-results/index.html

“Dixville Notch voters have supported the Democratic nominee the last two presidential elections, with the township in 2020 unanimously casting five votes for President Joe Biden and with Hillary Clinton in 2016 winning four of seven votes — two went to Trump and one to Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson.”

This thread is for the Presidential election, my plan is to start marking wins as soon as they are called, sorted by time zone.

Some states are going to take longer than others. Polls generally close at 8 PM local time, but they can’t start counting early/mail in votes until after the polls close.

Wisconsin in particular has an interesting system where ballots are collected by MUNICIPALITY, not precinct, they have over 1,800 ballot counting locations and don’t report until ALL 1,800 are in.

https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2024/10/22/wisconsin-voters-election-milwaukee-security-denier

Currently 232 EC votes from Blue States:

4+19+10+7+3+3+4+10+11 +4+14+28+4+3+13+54+12 +10+5+8+6

93 EC votes from Battleground States:

10+16+15+16+19+11+6

Which leaves 213 EC votes in Red States.

9+6+6+6+8+6+10+5+3+7 +3+40+30+11+8+17+9+11 +4+3+4+4+3

270 to Win.

Online map here!

https://apnews.com/projects/election-results-2024/

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Just listened to Selzer break down her methodology in clear, simple terms. I’m starting to think the polling error this cycle is pretty big, and Harris is going to win handily.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’ve been thinking about this too.

      I’ve heard a lot of commentary about how polling has addressed the shortcomings of recent election cycles and that its more or less all fixed now. I do wonder though, there seems to be a heap of things that are very difficult to account for.

      For example, who’s actually going to vote vs just intending to vote. For example the garbage thing has motivated a lot of people to get it done.

      Another is the late break. I think for a lot of people that just don’t pay attention to politics, if you ask them 2 weeks ago they just haven’t really thought about it - their answers are precooked from last cycle. As the big day comes around and people think about candidates, lots of traditional republicans voters will make a different choice.

      Also just generally with polls is the type of person that actually completes polls. Most people ain’t got time for that.

      Of course I understand pollsters try to control for these things but as these problems stack up its easy to see how there can be some surprises.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      God I hope so… The #1 problem with polling has been trying to determine who is or is not a “likely voter”.

      We’re seeing that in PA. 22 recent polls, 18 “Likely Voter” polls, meanwhile 100,000 new voters casting ballots early. New voters aren’t counted as “likely”.