That command prompt.

  • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    251
    ·
    1 month ago

    They could steal your personal data without you knowing.

    Hah! Like the “legal” services are much better than that!

  • Cethin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    1 month ago

    You should use legal streams that you pay for so you know they’re stealing your personal data!

  • Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    They could steal your personal data without you knowing.

    So very ironic when it’s the opposite between them.

  • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    1 month ago

    so i went to their website. For a site thats immediate branding is about how scary and dangerous hackers are, you’d think their news section would be full of fraud and ransomware stories. instead, their “latest news” is solely articles about people being arrested for using pirate streaming services or selling loaded firesticks.

    The single exception to this is a “social experiment” they allegedly did where they put a QR code up at the tube marked as “free streaming for life” and had people put pii in to sign up. This entire “initative” is solely another way to harvest user data lmao.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 month ago

      people being arrested for using pirate streaming services

      What circumstances does that even happen in? Like a bar that plays a pirated sports stream?

      • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        Gonna be honest I didn’t read the articles so I’m not entirely sure. I did see a headline about cops going to peoples houses to issue warnings so maybe isps are snitching?

        • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’d be skeptical that’s even real, outside of a select few countries with especially strict copyright enforcement

          • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Not even in the US, which it seems leads the charge on enforcing copyright most of the time.

            It’s the “your internet could be disabled” scare tactics.

      • FarFarAway@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Theres firestick apps that stream all the regular channels, plus all the premium channels. (HBO, showtime, stars, ppv, etc) Essentially for $10 - $20 a month you get the best, most decked out cable package one could buy. You may or may not have access to all the new and old movies, TV shows (from all the platforms), and porn, on demand, as well. Maybe like that?

    • Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      their “latest news” is solely articles about people being arrested for using pirate streaming services or selling loaded firesticks.

      So just to be clear, the damage then is not from the actual piracy or due to any invasion from the source of the piracy, but rather 100% of the danger comes from the enforcement of piracy’s prohibition.

      Yes, definitely sounds like piracy is the problem here 🙄

      • i_love_FFT@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yup! The fact that it is defined as “illegal” allows goons to storm your house and court troll to harrass you.

        Thus everything they say is true, in some way…

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          And it’s not even illegal in the sense most people think of, it’s a copyright violation. Which is a regulatory thing, not a criminal law thing.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      social experiment" they allegedly did where they put a QR code up at the tube marked as “free streaming for life” and had people put pii in to sign up

      It’s insane that this is even legal.

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I went to their website just to have a laugh. This is some real shizo propaganda.

    You could replace all of it with: Only watch self sourced pirated media! Paying and relying on any service has inherent risks

    “1 in 3 (32%) people who illegally stream in the UK say they, or someone they know, have been a victim of fraud, scams, or identity theft as a result.”

    320/1000 people know someone unlucky enough to fall for a scam.

    This risk increases significantly when users exchange credit or debit card information to view content on unregulated and illicit websites.

    If you pay for your pirated content you are doing it wrong.

    Watching content via an illicit source can expose younger viewers to age-inappropriate content. These unauthorised websites, devices, apps, add-ons, and the content they can access have no parental controls.

    My kids get a tablet exclusively pointing to a private media server in order to obtain the parental controls for-profit services just don’t provide. I banned YouTube kids, it was a shitfest.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 month ago

      320/1000 people know someone stupid enough to fall for a scam.

      Correction: 320/1000 people know someone unlucky enough to fall for a scam. Plenty of very smart people fall for scams. All it takes is some lucky timing on the part of the scammer, where enough happens to be correct that they miss/overlook whatever tells might be present until it’s too late

      This risk increases significantly when users exchange credit or debit card information to view content on unregulated and illicit websites.

      I mean, providing payment information to legitimate services is always a risk. There’s so freaking many breaches that you simply have to assume your card will see fraudulent charges sooner or later and watch your statements for the unexpected activity so you can stop and reverse the charges before you miss the deadline

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        I agree i should have used different words, scam-ableism is counter productive to educate about traps.

        I am pretty sure my dad fell for one of these because an ad popt up trying to pay a digital parking meter.

        Though he wasn’t trying to get access to illegal content what people behind this campaign are alluding towards.

        Scams come in so many shapes and forms, there is accidental click and there is “looked like an official Netflix page”. How many people will knowingly pay for something they know is available for free?

      • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        the way we share payment info to sites is so backwards is the reason despite all the problems paypal had, it still provide a lot of value.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          PayPal is nice since it gives virtually zero trust to the seller to secure customer info. But as you alluded to, PayPal has lots of problems mostly stemming from it trying to get all of the benefits of being a bank while accepting none of the responsibility of being a bank, and therefore customers receive none of the benefits of a bank while still getting all of the drawbacks of another entity handling their money

    • LifeBandit666@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you pay for your pirated content you are doing it wrong

      I don’t think I am, it’s Usenet and a VPN, and costs less than my Spotify Family account.

      • oldfart@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        And you can pay with crypto, not providing any personal information at all

          • oldfart@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Oh that is so odd. I’m not from the US but I think cryptocurrencies are somehow associated with right wing there and the left wing hates on them because of this?

            It’s so odd seeing people self-describing as oppressed minorities hating on technology that lets you bypass that oppression.

            So, as always, politicians are at fault

  • xep@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 month ago
    C:\> They could steal your personal data without you knowing. </
    At line:1 char:57
    + They could steal your personal data without you knowing. </
    +                                                          ~
    The '<' operator is reserved for future use.
        + CategoryInfo          : ParserError: (:) [], ParentContainsErrorRecordException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : RedirectionNotSupported
    
    • el_abuelo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      I heartedly recommend Usenet. Bit more involved setting up than torrents but if you’re looking for fast and quality content then this is the way.

      • weirdo_from_space@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ll definitely try usenet when I have the money to pay for it, niche content without jumping through private tracker hoops sounds awesome. Though I also love torrents, so it could go either way in the end.

  • YourPrivatHater@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The website is run by Skynews, wich is not directly disclosed on the website, the privacy options button doesn’t work, it doesn’t have a cookie banner but does set a cookie (illegal in EU), it has a injection for Facebook, Instagram and YouTube, by doing all that, they are less compliant to GDPR than my fucking piracy site…

    All in all it looks like a intern made a WordPress website, designwise ok, but regarding legality, functionality and content its at best for printing it on toilet paper.

  • Laristal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 month ago

    Legal stuff isn’t much better these days. Advertisements unless you pau more, user tracking regardless, etc.

      • Laristal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        And even if there are legal ramifications. The fines are low enough that its a cost of doing business for the most part. Especially in comparison to the amount of money they make spying. Possibly on top of whatever else they sell depending on the business in question.

        Most insidious part about the whole thing is the fact that most legal stuff is “licensed” rather than owned. A convenient legal fiction to allow them to revoke access at any time and (likely) keep your money.

  • YourPrivatHater@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 month ago

    They are actually less prone to big data theft… “they could steal your personal data without you know”…while the “legal” streaming sites are stealing orders of Magnitude more wich is pretty clear by the amount of data they transmit, a website has usually no access to your contact info, your entire hard drive, the contact info of everyone in your contacts, your microphone or your camera.

      • unrelatedkeg@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Oh, if Disney Corp could use the mouse pointer or the one on your desk, or even a living breathing mouse, or whatever else mouse or not rest assured - if killing you somehow benefits them they’ll do it. They might do it from sheer incompetence too and they’ll try to write it off as business as usual. Also, it applies to anyone you know for good measure.