• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The crazy thing was Vista was great with good hardware. The huge problem it had was strong security. Everything was locked down and required admin elevation to change.

    You know how Linux requires su for every system change and everyone thinks that’s fine? That was Vista but it enraged techies to click an ok box for su.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Iirc, tasks requiring elevated permissions wasn’t the main complaint, maybe just one of the most vocal ones.

      Even with good hardware, it was not optimized for performance in general. This was amplified by the fact they also marketed Vista as having a wide range of older hardware support, which resulted in many users upgrading from XP only to have their performance absolutely tank. I think there was even a lawsuit because of how they marketed some devices as, “Vista ready.”

      Regardless, Vista was still better than Windows 8.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Can confirm 100%.

      During Vista’s heyday, I worked in a PC repair shop. All the ones that came in because “Vista sucks” were all Walmart specials with the bare minimum 512 MB RAM and crappy, bottom-of-the-barrel Seagate HDDs.

      The thing would start thrashing as soon it booted with the default assortment of bloatware. By the time they brought it in, the HDD was in rough shape which made the thrashing even worse.

      Fix was always to upgrade the RAM and, most often, replace the dying Seagate drive with a good one. Removing the bloatware helped as well once the root problems were addressed.

      The UAC stuff was also annoying, but those could be tuned.

      • Benjaben@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yep, I did similar around the time. Can’t blame people for being mad that the thing they bought is damn near unusable (and was destined to be, but they didn’t understand that part). If someone buys a new bike, even if it’s cheap, it shouldn’t roll like you’re on gravel after a couple weeks and become impossible to pedal within months. But damn, there were a lot of horrible machines sold in those days.

        And then of course, the least fun part of that era, the guys who would bring their machines back weekly despite very stern warnings to stop visiting “those sites”.

        • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          And then of course, the least fun part of that era, the guys who would bring their machines back weekly despite very stern warnings to stop visiting “those sites”.

          Hey, they were good for business lol

          Lady he's putting my kids through college

          • Benjaben@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Definitely not wrong! Especially once you’ve dialed in your routine of anti-malware utilities to run on pretty much everything. It’s like an antibiotic cocktail, lol. Or did you prefer the “back up and nuke on sight” approach?

            • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              I’d usually start with my suite of cleanup tools, do some manual cleanup if needed, apply all the software and security updates, and then give it a day with some light test usage. Then I’d re-run the tools to see if they picked anything back up. If not, I released it back to the customer. If anything at all came back, I’d backup their data, pull all the product keys I could (Office, Photoshop, etc), nuke the OS, and reinstall what I could as close to the original as possible.

    • twinnie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I remember defending it online against a bunch of Linux users and I got told that the UAC prompt is overbearing while having to type your password is fine because it’s just “muscle memory”.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      this! i got my first vista experience on a laptop with a Turion and 2GB of RAM and it was really smooth. bit too chunky for my taste ux-wise but it was solid. first bluescreen i got on that machine was after installing W7.

      then the GPU melted its own solder after a few years and that machine was relegated to server duty.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I think it enraged everyone, but when you’re already using a more secure system (Linux), the whiplash isn’t so surprising. Speaking as a non-Windows user, so just my outside observation.

        • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 hours ago

          The main issue was that Vista asked for admin rights all the time. One of the first things they addressed with SP1 was to require admin privileges for fewer operations, cutting down on the number of UAC prompts.