• hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    165
    ·
    3 months ago

    I like how she asked not to be filmed and they filmed her anyway and then released it.

    It really shows how much they care about a woman’s consent.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      3 months ago

      Could be even more sinister than that. Like if you think about it, why would they want to show that? It doesn’t show anything positive about his campaign or engagement, so releasing that footage won’t help him directly. But he is aware of how aggressive some of Trump’s supporters can be with people they hate. So I wonder if he decided to post that part of the video specifically to trigger the MAGAs that would harass (or worse) the business and/or employees.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It really shows how much they care about a woman’s consent.

      I don’t need consent from my TV in order to watch it.

      Edit: Ran afoul of Poe’s Law. “Surely no one would actually believe I was serious right?”
      Internet: Gestures broadly

      • hperrin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Are you comparing a living breathing woman who’s doing her job to your TV? Like, you do know you need consent to film in a private establishment, right?

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          I dropped the /s
          The point being they consider women to be objects so why would they care about her consent?

          • hperrin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Fair enough. I could definitely see a right wing fascist leaving that exact comment. It was very Matt Walshy. xD

    • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t know what the situation in the states is, but wouldn’t she be allowed to sue him for this, because they disrespected their privacy?

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        She should. It’s a “public” place, but it’s not like she chose to be there at that moment because she knew Vance was going to be there. She has no other choice than to be there, per the terms of her contract.