Yeah, I see your point. No use to repeat the same you can read in other comments or in those 274772 guides online. I was trying to imply to just generally harden ssh because then brute-force attempts should be no issue, unless you log everything and the disk space gets maxed out :D

Fml… yes, I meant CrowdSec. Thanks for the hint

• harden sshd
• use fail2ban or even better CrowdStrike CrowdSec
• use a tool like the following to have a next-gen security solution: https://github.com/mrash/fwknop

What’s up, buddy? Why the sudden silence? Or did you finally realize that “Signal security failure” was never something someone said and it was actually just something the author came up with?

That’s right. It is just unnecessary to mention Signal at all in this case, as it might cause confusion.

All good. It’s just an unnecessary punch against Signal. Especially journalist rely heavily on it, so I don’t know what the intention was with this title.

And where exactly do you see “Signal security failure” in the quoted text?

Sure sure. Oh. About the quotes. Do you mind sharing a screenshot of the quotes you are talking about?

Tell me you are dense, without telling me you are dense. You can’t make this shit up 🤣

There are no quotes. So it is not something Trump said. It was interpreted by the author of the news story.

Have my upvote. Because my view is the same. The title included a quote, which is even marked as a quote. However, “Signal security failure” is without quotes. So the author just chose to unnecessarily blame Signal, instead of the real issue.