The person that wrote the anti article thinks that 2fa is a form of password… they’re the one that doesn’t understand passkeys.

Password manager can store passkeys as well. They’re way easier to fill than passwords, they always work and never have issues with filling like you can have on some websites that just don’t work well with pw managers.

12 Angry Men

I don’t drink milk, I’m just asking if you want to see it in stores.

Of what? From what source? Collected in what way? Just blindly trusting a chart with no data attached to it is exactly how we got into the misinformation age.

I mean do you want to see human breast milk in stores?

It’s also bitter, which humans are evolved to dislike. So it literally is an acquired taste, because some people drink decaf.

All beers are bitter, things humans evolved to stay away from (bitter signals poison). If you like beer, it’s because you’ve become accustomed to it, not because it’s a good flavor to humans.

It’s :thumbsup: on every other platform. Sounds like they’re fixing their mistake.

1Password

lol real life barely anything is sharp. Even stuff made by humans you usually want to chamfer or bevel. Sharp shit hurts.

Nobody said anything about enforcing it. Just put it in the contribution guidelines!! Like for fucks sake, this is like saying you shouldn’t have a law saying you can’t murder people out at sea because it’s impossible to police. The threat of action is half of the reason people don’t do bad things. There’s ZERO REASON to not have it in the guidelines.

what can they do despite ban LLM usage altoguether (and per consequence get LLM generated code submitted anyway), they can’t have a blacklist for models, or force contributors to run them on their local hardware.

But they can? Like OP pointed out, wine forbids contributions from those that have seen Windows source code. How in the world are they supposed to enforce that? Turns out the open source community is pretty good at self enforcing.

Yes please. YT isn’t a proper source unless it’s literally the source, for example something like TIL Felix baumgartner jumped from space in xxxx and it’s the actual video.

And yeah I’m sick of the news articles too.

In what world is a production codebase 75k lines. A single project at my last company was 1.4 million lines of code. Every single one of our microservices had more lines of code than that. And just my team was responsible for 50+ microservices. And thirteen tokens per line is hilariously low.

Holding a week of chat in your head is nothing when 90% of it is stuff that is incorrect or discussed and minds changed. This is exactly why my boss keeps saying conflicting things, the LLM doesn’t know what is true or not. It just regurgitates the random thing from context.

I’m also not really a fan of technology connections. He just says the same thing 20 different ways for thirty plus minutes. His videos could literally be 5-10 minutes long and you wouldn’t notice any loss in learning.

Module resolution is a pretty solid reason as to why it’s bad.

someone above listed exactly why Python’s is so bad. it’s pretty bad compared to most other solutions, even ruby’s, which isn’t as good as modern solutions.

You’re not spelling anything out. This article you are commenting under is literally about the case when YOU ARE NOT BUYING A LICENSE.

Like holy fucking shit you are fucking dense.

And yes you are not buying the fucking copyright. It’s like you don’t understand what that means. If you buy a book from the store you are not buying a license. YOU ALSO AREN’T BUYING THE COPYRIGHT.

Sorry, but you do NOT own any of the copyrighted works that have ever been given to you or purchased.

Yes you do. Buying the copyright has nothing to do with buying the product. Here’s an example. I as a photographer can sell you an image. I own the copyright on that. You cannot duplicate and resell my works as your own. But you can do whatever the fuck you want with the original you purchased. But guess what, I can also sell you a license to use that work instead of selling you the product. So I can say, you can’t do whatever you want with this. You can only use it for personal use cases or in one book. Nothing else. That’s selling you a license. Finally, I can sell you the entire copyright for the photo, transferring that copyright to you entirely, meaning now I can’t do anything I want with my own creation anymore.

These are three different things. You are only buying a license in a very specific context. You are almost never as an individual purchasing a copyright, though businesses buy and sell them all the time.

For the case above, Sony was selling you the full product. They were not selling a license. They were not selling the copyright. They were selling you an item you owned and can resell.

The first-sale doctrine (also sometimes referred to as the “right of first sale” or the “first sale rule”) is a legal concept that limits the rights of an intellectual property owner to control resale of products embodying its intellectual property.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-sale_doctrine

The first sale doctrine literally has NOTHING TO DO with ownership. It has to do with resale restrictions of the copyright holder. You have completely misunderstood the law and its purpose.