ElTacoEsMiPastor

at that point I start recycling them, and go back to parenthesis.

so when bp = 300x - 3, this:

4( 4[ 4{ 15bp + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000

would turn to

4( 4[ 4{ 15( 300x - 3) + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000

perhaps not the best, but I rather stick to conventional symbols rather than using… idk, question marks? that’d be funny as hell, though

just picture it:

4© 4« 4¿ 15bp + 10 ? - 375 » - 2250 🄯 - 15000

Don’t use your funny words on me, magic one

Thanks! Tired of removing the tracking “?si=” parameter from YT links

ETA: Fun clip, nonetheless. “Smoothness over clarity”, huh.

what is?

The easiest to grasp at a glance is Upvotes/Downvotes.

Though I understand how Score + Upvote% would be useful, percentages are impactful when there’s more than 100 reactions (which is uncommon).

I love this being a reply instead of an edit, ha.

Thanks for laying out what calculations would be needed, and why it may be a little harder to parse for a layperson.

that toast must really be evil…

Agreed. It’s a deal breaker.

It takes out of the equation how many people actually interacted with it at first glance.

Edit: The 10% downvote is the most reasonable of the bunch. Please let it be configurable.

thanks!

is this common for xkcd? because then I’ve been missing a whole layer of all the comics I’ve stumbled upon.

Thanks for the nuanced response. Obviously both FP and LTT are defending their own interests and neither are inherently better.

thanks! I didn’t know it was a bug; i liked it. could it become a feature? it’s nice to reach the end of the feed.

This downvote proposal is good, but some instances don’t have them enabled.

Just the option to hide post, without necessarily interacting with it, would be great.

e.g.: On the options that pop up from the three dots, to have ‘Hide’ ‘Block’ and ‘Report’

thanks, bot. i wouldn’t know otherwise that this post on c/selfhosted is about #selfhosted

Oh, i get it! Yeah, 30% is a considerable percentage.

Where I work (text-based customer support), a few weeks ago I stumbled upon a spreadsheet analysing that they could “save” 25% in wages by implementing GPT-4.

It may still be mostly humans on the line, but 1 out 4 of us may get the boot.

I don’t think it’s perceived as good? (curious, why would it be?) Just that it’s disingenuous to market it as AI. Everyone and their mother now has “”“AI”“” 🤷‍♂️

I assume having them split by the predefined categories, instead of juggling all the open windows.

Then again, I don’t know other alt-tab options.

This is basically the P=NP problem! 🤔💀

Yeah, you can easily assess whether things are going ok at any moment, but it’s hard as fuck to know how to make things ok from scratch.

Exactly! That, and I can tweak my writing to see if it conveys what I want. I cannot just hit ctrl+z when I’m talking.

Most times I feel I’m having these galaxy-brain thoughts but they come across as pea-brain sentences when trying to articulate them (how long is long enough for a rant/explanation?). Going meta has also not gone well for me. By that I mean discussing about how we’re discussing the topic at hand. It seems to be shrugged off as a tangent or distraction, when I believe it’s a good baseline for the current and future conversations I might have with the person.

Discourse online is better suited for the exchanges I like to have with others (such as the folks on this very thread), because arguments can be better fleshed out and people are less afraid to share their rationale. Ideas and perspectives can clash, but it’s not necessarily bad. Just like peer review in science papers.

I’ve never not had this issue while writing a comment since I first downloaded it, back to v0.0.35 around 2 months ago. Hopefully it’ll be addressed soon.

It’s quite frustrating, but I ended up being used to work around it (mainly tapping multiple times to the end of the comment). Feels like whacking an old TV to make it work.