I think we need to either redefine safe spaces, change people’s expectations of them, or get rid of them entirely.
I think we need to either redefine safe spaces, change people’s expectations of them, or get rid of them entirely.
This is a very extreme example. I’m saying that more nuanced discussion and differences in views from within a community struggle in safe spaces.
I understand the concept. I’m saying that this way of working creates echo chambers.
Unfortunately, a lot of these safe spaces become echo chambers. People don’t want to have their views challenged or try to see things from other perspectives. Many attempts at constructive dissent as mentioned in this post are discouraged and are generally unwelcome.
I did use the cross-post feature. Many apps do not recognise or acknowledge cross-posting yet which might explain why this article may have appeared multiple times for you.
This was originally published in 2021 so I wonder why it has a new article.
https://www.iflscience.com/fully-intact-dinosaur-embryo-found-inside-fossilized-egg-62004
So you’re not looking for an audio editor, but rather live recording software that supports multiple simultaneous inputs? The more specific your request for help is, the better suggestions you’ll get.
“Meesa tree!”
What features is Audacity missing for your needs?
Is dupeGuru what you’re looking for?
dupeGuru is a tool to find duplicate files on your computer. It can scan either filenames or contents. The filename scan features a fuzzy matching algorithm that can find duplicate filenames even when they are not exactly the same. dupeGuru runs on Mac OS X and Linux.
dupeGuru is good with pictures. It has a special Picture mode that can scan pictures fuzzily, allowing you to find pictures that are similar, but not exactly the same
I think tapping the name should bring up the user page and tapping the post should bring up the post. Pretty straightforward.
This exact article was posted here 12 hours ago: https://lemmy.ml/post/2667920
Why does it make it dubious that the subject of a website is in its name? What if a website called “Stop Food Waste” takes about food waste?
Um, because they already have a clear agenda? They could be likely to be selective with their sources, not report on things that go against their view, etc.
I read the article and I encourage you to do the same if you did not already.
I read the article, thank you.
An article about population decline on a website literally called “Stop Population Decline” doesn’t give me the impression it’ll be fully balanced and unbiased.
I don’t think this is yet possible in the Lemmy protocol itself.
Someone else posted an updated article already. This remains as is.
Correct at the time of posting.
Archive link: https://archive.is/KYcey
I’m on 0.0.41 and it does nothing.
Who said anything about challenging views all or most of the time?
The issue with constructive dissent is that if someone perceives an initial idea as bad, it cannot be dismissed or criticised; it has to be built on. Do we want things to be built on flawed foundations? We should be able to say “no” without being cast out from our own community.