Opt-in by default is illegal, so OP has every right to be annoyed.
Opt-in by default is illegal, so OP has every right to be annoyed.
No vibration at all? That’s a really strange choice…
I guess you’re right. I should’ve upgraded first and checked it, oh well.
It specifically does mention that though. In Plasma 6.1 you can choose EDID, custom ICC profile or no profile.
Maybe. Or maybe it’s something else and it just looks like CPU error.
Does this always fail the same way after reboot?
If you can still boot, maybe you can try running memtest and see what happens.
See the line starting with “IPID”? Try googling for these codes and see if any results sound familiar to your situation.
Otherwise your only option is to try another CPU and see if error goes away.
Wayland isn’t all that new anymore anyway.
AFAIK they already defaulted to Wayland years ago, and a few years that I’ve used it on my work PC I had no problems.
Why? Do you really think Google started out evil, and not step by step by implementing “improvements” similar to this one?
I’m not planning to move anywhere tbh.
I do. If they go through with it than they’re not much better than Google.
If they don’t have enough money maybe they could start with cutting the CEO’s pay.
A few are mentioned here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Spotify#Third-party_clients
Yeah, but I don’t really use them, so not the best person to ask. :)
No, it’s not.
It says it’s a “Spotify client”. It simply isn’t.
I don’t know why, but personally it really rubs me the wrong way.
It’s not really “false advertising”, since it’s not a paid app, but still…
Real open source alternatives exist, but they require Spotify Premium to actually stream music legally straight from Spotify.
But it’s not a Spotify client, is it?
IIRC it uses Spotify APIs to generate playlists, but that’s all.
Actual music gets streamed from YouTube.
It’s probably something with your OS.
People like to meme about Nvidia being unusable on Linux, but before switching to AMD I was running various Nvidia GPUs for more than a decade and they were always rock-stable.
It’s not only legal to assume, it’s a requirement to default to “no”.
Tracking is opt-in.
I don’t know if I’d call that “admirable”. It’s not the first time I see Gnome team basically telling the users “STFU, we know better”.
Damn, this thread you’ve linked… I can’t believe they didn’t even want to consider giving the user an option to choose the behavior for themselves.
Well, it is essentially what they’re doing already with DRM.
Try watching a full resolution stream on any paid streaming service using “bad” software, like Firefox or Linux.
Yeah, he never did nothing for me! Fuck him!
It’s EU’s GDPR.
Anything like a newsletter or marketing must be opt-in. And it cannot be bundled with other consent, that is they can’t refuse to provide you a service if opt-in isn’t absolutely necessary.
To be honest, not sure if any other countries have such laws.