It’s the judge in the Simpsons if you want to find more

He asked the DEA to reevaluate which is all he can do legally unless congress passes new laws.

Fiber maybe but no one is eating actual fur.

“Melanie” isn’t a blonde.

And hers isn’t made up based off of Russian money laundering.

A reminder that all Trump businesses have failed and he’s literally bankrupted a casino five separate times (and a hotel once). One of his spawn has also stated that the family has been “debanked” or fired as clients (due to financial, legal, regulatory, or reputational risk). Ironic that debanking usually comes under scrutiny for how it has disproportionately targeted Muslims and minorities.

If you’re not there for the clean out then it’s time for them to go anyway.

She lost her primary because of her anti-Trump stance. She’s overall still a conservative and basically causative for the current GOP via her votes and other ideals but she is willing to stand her ground on that at least.

My brother, that explanation is not nearly dumbed down enough and as with most math wiki is useless for eli5 stuff.

That’s not a misinterpretation. That is the accusation which is under criminal investigation and behind the reasoning he tried to drown one of his sons (now a legal adult and not in the custody issue).

Strawberries, saved you a click.

I think that type of feedback is a forever thing. How it may be done can change (even some PIs just do comments in the file instead of printing and handwriting) but I don’t see a scenario when that isn’t useful anymore.

This only builds a formated bibliography where your input is an unformated bibliography… It also can’t accurately do the more tedious (and important)part of actually putting the in text citations. In short you have to do the same amount of upfront work of getting all the relevant citations in a list then additional work on checking that the llm formatted properly and didn’t hallucinate then still have to go put in the in text citations.

Wheres with endnote or zotero you choose from your list add the intext, autoformat from your choice and it’s automatically put in a formatted bibliography.

Yes having friends/colleagues read papers before submission is still common practice.

I’m a younger millennial. I was still pretty young during Bush jr term 1 and while there was certainly distrust of Cheney and Bush there was a general positive note towards the actual office of the president and a congress that while slow still did things. I hadn’t learned about Newt’s fuckery nor really understood Bush v Gore. Then there was Iraq and it took a long time before we heard about the lies used to start the war. Then Obama was overall a positive influence on the presidential reputation(deservedly or not is debatable). Congress (at least Rs) certainly lost much of my trust under Obama with the shutdowns and nominee holdups. This is when I started paying more attention. Then, of course Trump made any trust in the office 0 (if not negative) and Rs lost all trust from the repeated hypocrisy and plain evil and of course the impeachment debacles. Biden was improving trust in the office of the president at least somewhat before Gaza. Congress on the other hand (Dems included now because of Manchin, Sinema, Feinstein, etc) has lost any remaining trust I had.

I can’t speak for others but while I generally always disliked congressional representatives I naively had faith in the institution overall for longer than I should have.

Depends on where those taxes are used. I really hate how much goes to our military instead of social services.

As I said a compromise measure. I’m good with compromise but there are more considerations to that which I haven’t seen addressed in these discussions.

A major one of getting it done state by state instead of all at once is if a large Blue state like California does the split but a large red state like Texas doesn’t do the split then the electoral college will only get further skewed instead of fixed.

He also pioneered the “Halsted” radical mastectomy treatment for breast cancer, basically a full mastectomy including pectoral muscles and armpit lymph nodes.

Or we could simply get rid of the electoral college and say a vote is a vote.

Like as a compromise measure before getting rid of the electoral college delegates based on % is an improvement but how to split based on % would be very contentious. In a 10 delegate state does 52% 48% mean 5 and 5 or 6 and 4? What about a 3 delegate states. Maine and Nebraska do assign some to the state popular vote and one to each congressional district. But states like Wyoming and Vermont only have 1 congressional district that covers the whole state while having 3 delegates. Their state popular vote and congressional district popular vote literally can’t be different.

Republicans are coming for their old people benefits. They want to gut Social Security and Medicare. Any old person that has a scrap of intelligence hearing that is simply following their own self-interest to vote Democrat. Also helps that most young people in their lives are probably talking about Harris positively. We’ll see if that pans out at the polls.

Early whales for the taxonomically challenged.