Cheers! Got a bit clearer now.
Cheers! Got a bit clearer now.
Appreciated if someone can explain what is the problem and its context in simple terms 🙏
I understand the GNU “framework” is built on free, open source software. So I don’t understand how one can “discover” that there were pieces of non-free software there… They were put there by mistake?
😂
The current security philosophy almost seems to be: “In order to make it secure, make it difficult to use”. This is why I propose to go a step further: “In order to make it secure, just don’t make it”. The safest account is the one that doesn’t exist or that can’t be accessed by anyone, including its owner.
We aren’t supposed to accept that. We can simply not use their software. And as users that’s the only power we have on devs. But it’s a power that only works on devs who are interested in having many users.
Nobel prize in computer science. Looks like the Nobel Prize committee has forgotten what Physics is.
Fully agree.
It’s worth posting the blog post you linked.
Which can be further summarized: academics (🙋🏻) are basically a bunch of idiotic sheep, despite being in academia.
See also https://pluralistic.net/2024/08/16/the-public-sphere/#not-the-elsevier
Fantastic, this is extremely helpful, thank you! 🥇 I wanted to test a couple of distros for my Thinkpad, and I’ll make sure to check and save this kind of information from live USBs.
Thank you, that’s useful info, I didn’t know about this. Could you be so kind to share some link, or say something more, about lspci and lsmod and how to proceed from them to identifying which drivers one should install? Cheers!
Absolutely agree. Edited the post with a warning.
Yeah to me too. I’m not clicking on that “Download client” link for sure.
As most who have already commented here, I’m somewhat unimpressed (and would expect more analytical subtlety from a scientist). Wittgenstein already fully dissected the notion of “free will”, showing its semantic variety of meanings and how at some depth it becomes vague and unclear. And Nietzsche discussed why “punishment” is necessary and makes sense even in a completely deterministic world… Sad that such insights are forgotten by many scientists. Often unclear if some scientists want to deepen our understanding of things, or just want sensationalism. Maybe a bit of both…
Yeah, happy to see Todo again. He’s fun & funny :)
Thank you for the neat examples! :) I think I get it now.
Thank you! What you wrote confused me at first, I thought that using @something
created a post that was only visible to user something
– like a direct message. Now I’ve re-read the help pages, and I see that there’s a second “” at the bottom of the post field, to make the post only visible to
something
; otherwise (globe icon) is public.
May I ask: in this latter case, what does @something
achieve then? is it a sort of “user mention”, so the user is notified to have been mentioned in a public post? Will other users interested in something
see it then?
[Edit: I realize that my question was phrased in a completely misleading way. Corrected now.]
Cheers!
Agree (you made me think of the famous face on Mars). I mean that more as a joke. Also there’s no clear threshold or divide on one side of which we can speak of “human intelligence”. There’s a whole range from impairing disabilities to Einstein and Euler – if it really makes sense to use a linear 1D scale, which very probably doesn’t.
I really want to see what happens. It seems to me these “agents” are still useless in handling tasks like customer inquiries. Hopefully customers will get tired and switch to companies that employ competent humans instead…