Get yer fresh oafs right here! Gottem fresh! Pre-sliced & prêt-à-mànger! Gettim while they’re hot!

If memory serves, the French invented a huge apparatus for that, inspired by a bread slicer.

Jill Stein is the latest in an interminable line of Green Party fucknuts “killing” the Green Party.

Next.

Whereas, this is young Hanlon’s Razor^fade

Good bot. We’ll need your vigilance more and more these next several weeks, friend. 😅🙇🏽‍♂️

Except… Their entire cousin-fuckin’ base keeps getting reassured that “their” Pres & VP are those two fuckstains and alllll this is just a formality on the righteous way back to the --throne-- White House… 🤬☠️

So, that’s a honey badger in a capy disguise?

Thanks! It all starts with refusing to talk politics or fanatical book clubs at parties, FYI. Good luck out there, neighbor! 🖖🏽

TBF, I was low-key agreeing with you, but you do you, Trigger.

Oh? You feel like gracing us all with specifics of these “somewhat useful” “super generalizations”, bud? That would be generous.

As super generalizations go, I guess.

Maybe it’s the sample size being a bit lacking? I’m no expert, but IIRC, 1k is the bare minimum for such, and only 871 of those surveyed are relevant to the results — or, am I missing something?

The latest Reuters/Ipsos poll surveyed 1,029 U.S. adults online, nationwide, including 871 registered voters. Among these, 785 were considered the most likely to turn out on Election Day. Among these likely voters, Harris led 50% to 44%, though similar to her lead among all registered voters, her advantage was only five points when using unrounded figures.

Here’s hoping something works.

Modulating one’s speech according to audience is not dialectic morphology, much less general etymology — it’s a matter of scope.

You can use whatever you want, no argument there. Whether or not it comes off sounding semi-literate is more up to your audience and your own self-awareness than any “centralized governing body”, citizen. 🙇🏽‍♂️🫣

Wrong, sorry. Októpus is a Greek word that translates to “eight foot,” and pluralizing it via Latin has no etymological basis. “Acceptable/widely used” is in no way synonymous to “correct”, let’s not forget.

Unlike “octopi”. 🙇🏽‍♂️

Gotta abolish that fuckin’ thing, frankly. 🫣

YFW they’re spy phones, all the way down.

Don’t believe the hype. VOTE.

Veni, Vidi, Thesaurisi?