• 0 Posts
  • 49 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 27th, 2023

help-circle



  • nakal@kbin.socialtoLinux@lemmy.mlIs Ubuntu deserving the hate?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    This doesn’t seem to be a problem with snap. Canonical probably tried to show vendors a way how to distribute software commercially. But vendors are on the level of cavemen and don’t know shit about Linux even after serving a solution. Or they simply don’t care about building up a market opportunity.

    I don’t want to defend Ubuntu. I don’t like Ubuntu especially, but it might be a simple explanation.













  • nakal@kbin.socialtoLinux@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    (My opinion) No, you aren’t paranoid. I’m thinking a bit like you, but I also consider probabilities. You need to download the checksums from the official website and the ISO from mirrors. Two different sources would need to be hacked. This is where I say, it’s hard and secondly someone would notice that hack very quickly.

    Signing the ISO or the checksums with a well-known signature is still important. I verify it, if a signature available. It’s just a couple of seconds and doesn’t cost anything.





  • Of course, it’s better to use some frameworks for logging, especially because these verbose statements are often needed for assertions while unit testing the code. But it’s still equivalent to printf.

    I use debugger sometimes. I actually like to load core dumps to take a look at the stack trace. But I usually don’t really need debugger interactively because when some error appears, I usually already have an idea what happened. And lots of embedded code needs timing in milliseconds, so debuggers won’t help.