Almost a troll-like insistence on lack of nuance to an extremely complex situation
Almost a troll-like insistence on lack of nuance to an extremely complex situation
Removed by mod
I believe black people’s lives matter. I hold that view so strongly that I’m willing to shout it in the streets. Does that make part of a political extremist movement?
That’s quite the false equivalence you’ve made there
I’ll take both please
Pretty sure Whole Foods had shitty conservative executives back then too didn’t they?
Thank you. As someone who knows nothing about that religion this headline was extremely confusing to me
Here’s todays winner for most unintelligible title
Even accounting for how car-centric US cities are, I agree with that commenter. Yeah it may be hard to get downtown from outlying neighborhoods without a car, but sidewalks have ramps and building have access. Hell, the parking lots have designated parking spaces. Not true at all in most European cities
Edit: I guess it’s worth a little more nuance than just limping all European cities in the same category. The wealthier northern cities have definitely caught up a bit (though they all still have buildings that are completely inaccessible). The real problems are the southern cities like Rome, Madrid, Athens, Lisbon etc.
That’s approximately the total number of people who will die in the next 100 years from anything. There’s only about 60 million deaths per year now, which will climb to like 120 million by the end of the century due to shifting demographics. These authors are basically just saying “a majority of deaths will have some climate related basis”.
Tl;dr - some businesses will be impacted, but it probably won’t drag down our economy much at all.
Wasn’t there a similar story about “Born in the USA” ?
He probably has lawyers fighting literally every step
Don’t apologize, this is fantastic! Know any resources that pertain to the Pacific Northwest?
It’s self reported. They released it before he entered the building
Anyone know of a “how to” guidelines for doing this in different regions? I assume you need to have a forest succession plan where fast-growers go in first and slow growers follow?
Granted, but I don’t think they can really discern the difference
Does it really need to push the idea that a new conflict is coming though? The US military moves people around with unclear (public) reasons often.
Removed by mod