Someone find the article of the Economist glorifying Britain’s genocide in India from a back in the day. It seems like little has changed.
Someone find the article of the Economist glorifying Britain’s genocide in India from a back in the day. It seems like little has changed.
Looool. Iraq war consent manufacturing all over again.
Good time to remind people there are more than two buttons, not just third party candidates, but local and Congressional organizing
Funny enough, I think that all started with a study about hormone mimicking plastics.
Republican: “Everything to the left of me is woke.”
Republican pretending to be liberal online: “Everything to the left of me is tankie.”
At the end of the day it’s a word that can mean anything you want, and is only useful as a tactic to divide resistance against right wingers.
Crying about “tankies” is just calling everything “woke” with extra steps. Not everyone there automatically supports NATO/Ukraine but it’s far from what you describe.
He’s opportunistcally envokning it as socialism is popular, but cares for nothing other than the political clout the label may bring.
Fascism exists to capture popular revolutionary sentiment, while preserving the old power structure.
Learning about the Hannibal Directive was a new low