• 1 Post
  • 80 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle


  • The idea behind tariffs is to increase the prices of imports so that domestic production can compete. Higher prices are definitely the point, but the idea is that at least with domestic production the price increases get circulated back into the domestic economy as jobs/wages. But, if the domestic economy can increase production without increasing wage expenditure then the money from the higher prices just goes to the shareholders.

    If it’s something for which there is no domestic production, it’s just a tax, and it should become a question of what does money from the tariffs get used for… probably taxcuts for the rich.





  • m0darn@lemmy.catoScience Memes@mander.xyzBehold, a square
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    I look at your diagram and see:

    ϴ= L/(L+R)
    

    And

    2π-ϴ = L/R
    

    I solved those (using substitution, then the quadratic formula) and got

    L= π-1 ± √(1+π²) ~= 5.44 or -1.16
    

    Whether or not a negative length is meaningful in this context is an exercise left to the reader

    Giving (for L=5.44):

    ϴ~= 0.845 ~~48.4° 
    

    I’m surprised that it solved to a single number, maybe I made a mistake.








  • m0darn@lemmy.catoScience Memes@mander.xyzAcademic writing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not who you’re responding to but I must vehemently disagree. In English, which doesn’t have a centralized governing body, the correct way of pronouncing/spelling something depends on your intention and expected audience. If your intended audience is English speakers then the correct spelling is probably octopi or octopuses, whichever you believe will cause the least confusion/distraction (surely it varies regionally).

    However, usually my intention is to portray my unfathomably superior knowledge and intellect, so the correct spelling/pronunciation in this case is: octopodes (which I think he had listed but ironically got ‘corrected’ to ‘octopuses’).






  • m0darn@lemmy.catoScience Memes@mander.xyzAcademic writing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t read much (/any) academic writing, but does it really misuse words the way the link portrays?

    Eg

    • academic writing isn’t prose, like that’s almost the definition of prose.
    • intra-specialized doesn’t mean anything (the intra prefix didn’t work on adjectives)
    • “obfuscating … accessibility” means making it difficult to see that it is accessible, where the author probably actually wants to say “reducing the ability of outsiders to access the meaning”

    I get that it is satire, but imo it would be better satire if he put in the work to actually make it mean something. Unless the point is that academic writers misuse thesauruses this badly.