minus-squarelemonlemonlemon@lemm.eeOPtoPiracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Are movie and show file sizes more efficient than they were years ago?linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·1 year agoThanks for all of the replies, they were very insightful! The H264 to H265 appears to account for the majority of differences that I was seeing in file sizes. linkfedilink
minus-squarelemonlemonlemon@lemm.eeOPtoPiracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Are movie and show file sizes more efficient than they were years ago?linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoOoof - thanks, I’ve fixed that. linkfedilink
lemonlemonlemon@lemm.ee to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · edit-21 year agoAre movie and show file sizes more efficient than they were years ago?plus-squaremessage-squaremessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1106
arrow-up1100message-squareAre movie and show file sizes more efficient than they were years ago?plus-squarelemonlemonlemon@lemm.ee to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square52fedilink
Thanks for all of the replies, they were very insightful!
The H264 to H265 appears to account for the majority of differences that I was seeing in file sizes.