I thought have bought this was internet fake. It’s not:
Uraba lugens is nicknamed the mad hatterpillar because of its distinctive exoskeletal feature.[4] Every time it sheds the head portion of its exoskeleton, the exoskeleton stays attached to its body. Over time, developing through its life span, the head grows bigger and sheds increasingly larger exoskeleton shells, which build upon each other.[5]
I tried to look this up and while there were many many results, none of them seemed to really fit with OP’s question, so would you kindly tell us more about the gay Spock problem?
The authors wrote that they were surprised too and went back to talk to the students and apparently there was an unwritten rule that you don’t date the ex of the new partner of your ex. So if Bob and Alice split up and Alice starts dating Ben, then Bob should not date Ben’s ex Alison.
Removed by mod
5 pages?!??! In my discipline, we spend five pages just kissing reviewer 2’s behind and begging people to take an interest. Then we spend 20 pages citing everyone and their adviser and their adviser’s second cousin on the off chance that they’re married to reviewer 2. Then you get a copy-paste of the documentation of one of the five datasets that everyone uses.
Auf den Zauberstab klicken, DOI eingeben, Magieeee. Man kann es mit Word, Latex, etc. kombinieren und damit sehr einfach zitieren. Aber die richtige Magie kommt ganz am Ende, wenn Zotero die Bibliografie von alleine erstellt und formatiert. Sollte deine Unibibo ein Zotero Tutorial anbieten, kann ich das nur empfehlen.
Korrektes Zitieren hat nichts mit der Plattform zu tun, über welche du es bezogen hast. Du schreibst ja auch nicht dazu, ob du es auf Papier in deiner Uni oder über Fernleihe oder über die elektronische Autobahn konsultiert hast. Solange du es wirklich konsultiert hast und den Regeln deiner Uni entsprechend zitierst, hast du deine Pflicht gegenüber der Uni und der Wissenschaft erfüllt. Und übererfüllt im Vergleich zu so einigen. Elsevier und Springer werden es überleben. Bonus-Klugscheiß: nur DOI angeben hört sich nach Formalitätenklatsche herausfordern an. Erleichtere dir das Leben, nutze Zotero oder so, die nehmen dir das lästige Formatieren und so ab. Klugscheiß-Genehmigungsnachweis: Doppel-Doktor.
Maybe this research and language is intended to suggest that there is a point past which “confusingly and unintuitively designed” strongly resembles “intentionally deceiving”? We’re probably not going to get internal emails saying “make it complicated so that we can collect users’ data”.
Also, researchers don’t really control how university press departments write up their results. Even less so when they’re interviewed by media.
Addendum: Apple takes great pride in UI and user-centered design, and lately they have been highlighting privacy as a differentiator from Android. Maybe they just dropped the ball, maybe people don’t care, maybe people aren’t very bright. Still, some people have questions:)