Obviously the bowling ball because it’s more MASSIVE.

I mean, I see that’s how they would have had to get to i, but it’s not a right triangle.

Doesn’t this also imply that i == 1 because CB has zero length, forcing AC and AB to be coincident? That sounds like a disproving contradiction to me.

I really don’t think it is.

Clearly you don’t eat babies! The whole point of eating babies is the skull comes apart.

Stephen Hawking did post to Twitter. He used Twitter to communicate about science, the future of humanity, and important causes like climate change. One of his first tweets was in 2014 when he used the platform to raise awareness about ALS, the disease he had lived with for decades. While not prolific on Twitter, the posts reflected his passion for science, space exploration, and human progress.

At least, according to ChatGPT.

When most of your life occurred in the 20th century, it looks a lot different.

WELL YOU’RE NOT

No CS undergrad really needs to learn anything post 1999.

Yes. Conservatives vote out of a sense of duty. They don’t really pay attention to politics. They vote every opportunity, no matter the circumstances. The 30% who always vote conservative are unaffected by the bullshit that makes progressives throw their hands up and walk away from it all. Progressives vote when they are motivated to vote, and can just as easily be demotivated. It’s shitty and we need to do better.

This is why I claim that fascism is less a political ideology than it is an expression and exploitation of basic human psychology. This isn’t an American thing. This isn’t a 2024 thing. Human beings believe this all over the world, and always do. A significant portion of us are hard wired to worry about “purity”, which can be sullied in a number of psychologically related ways, making us feel disgust. Such people tend conservative.

When something is described as Kafkaesque, this is the story being referenced.

“Do you have a source?” means, “I already know you are wrong but you won’t believe me unless you find out for yourself.”

For the same reasons that abolitionists are always considered insurgents against the states that practice slavery.

You could pick any two examples, and this is what you came up with.

It’s just the name of a particular kind of social get-together.

I went to an introvert’s munch once. It was held at a public library. Everyone just nodded and smiled at each other as they read books. No one spoke to anyone. It was amusing as performance art but it was a shitty munch.

You are reading intentions into the text.

Only flesh putrefies. By definition.

Accepting for the sake of discussion (but not generally) that hunting is “ethical”, hunting is also a privilege. We obviously cannot all eat hunted meat for survival. You’ve no doubt seen the figures. There are barely enough animals to support tourism and retroprimitivism. It’s not a real solution, it’s just something you can use to trick yourself. The lies we tell ourselves are not convincing to others.