- 1.41K Posts
- 299 Comments
1·19 hours agoTIL 1 man = all democrats.
We’re all Biden now!
Tens of millions of dollars for each of them, that’s why
It wasn’t actually pay per view, just sayin
Also, the payday was about 20 mil for Tyson iirc
In most countries, you vote for a party that has identical views to yours. Those parties then join with others whose views you might not agree with to form coalition governments.
In the USA, those disparate coalitions funnel into one party.
The Democrats aren’t a monolith and it’s disingenuous to suggest as much
Founding member of house progressive caucus, who has since ceded her power to younger generations, decides to keep running since she’s healthy
Cool story bro
I think the illogical part is how you cited sources that don’t say what you claim they are saying.
This is called “disinformation” folks
I’m not a mod in this community, so you’re asking the wrong person.
I’m also not sure if you’re confusing me with someone else?
Hilarious to me how the left echo chambers (in which I often participate) missed the takeaway from the election and somehow say (as they do with every election over the past couple decades) that this time the Dems moved to the right and that’s why they lost.
If the Dems really kept shifting so much to the right each cycle, how do you explain the past 4 years?
There was plenty of misinformation peddled by foreign actors(edit: and domestic ones tbh). Call that what you will
Ah yes and the Republicans are checks notes the progressives?
That weird city where the dem mayor sold out for Trump? Shocker
What a world we live in that we have to have articles like this
No offense but wtf Nate? Why would you use 2016 data when early voting was massively expanded since 2020?
Ok. Find me some major topics covered in other outlets that WaPo didn’t cover. If you’re making a point, please give evidence, as I did above
Read your article please?
Lewis begins the job Jan. 2
So, an article posted in late ‘23 says he begins in January. We’re agreeing he started in ‘24?
That was actually in 2024, so my point stands (not disagreeing with your sentiment though). This year has been the first time Bezos really inserted his views into the Post
Not at all. I’ve been making this argument for years on other sites. It’s always come up with at least 2/3 negative articles when you type in “Amazon” on WaPo.
The only evidence I’ve seen against me is stupid memes that screenshot the rare op ed defending Amazon
Is that a joke lol? Or are you too lazy to literally go to their website and type in “Amazon”?
There have been plenty, to answer your question.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/06/15/amazon-one-medical-patient-safety/
That’s just the first page (everything else that came up was about the Amazon rainforest)
On one hand, it’s true that he has exerted little influence before this year. On the other hand, “it doesn’t even matter” is a shit argument to silence your staff
100% agree but I think she signaled it a few times actually.