I straight up don’t believe you.
I straight up don’t believe you.
Uh, your ideas about where you’d find socialism are a bit backwards
You’re conflating the terms “socialism” and “democratic socialism”.
An actually ideologically socialist government wouldn’t have made them feel the need to flee, and would have done better picking up the pieces
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/peter-gelderloos-anarchy-works
A detailed summary of successful anarchist organisation throughout history.
Ancoms have definitely gotten shit done, you just sound salty tbh
It’s not very enlightened to call entire movements like libertarian socialism (AKA anarchism) just idealist, ineffectual, and to imply they’re essentially brainwashed by the US government.
Anti-state movements have a history as long and storied as socialism, and theoretical frameworks for their beliefs far more complex than you give them credit for.
And, as I’ve heard someone else point out - isn’t it literally anti-Semitic to assume that Jews and Israelis are, like, the same thing? And/or that Israel is, like, the global mouthpiece for Jews everywhere? Seems a bit reductive, to me… Seems on the same level as thinking the leader of Kenya, or Nigeria, or any African nation speaks for Black people everywhere.
Netanyahu isn’t the Emperor of Jews!
Yeah, I know it doesn’t actually “see” anything, and is just making best guesses based on pre-gathered data. I was just simplifying for the comparison.
Both the astronaut and horse are plagiarised from different sources, it’s definitely “seen” both before
Nope, human plagiarism is still plagiarism
Not even remotely the same. A producer still has to choose what to sample, and what to do with it.
An AI is just a black box with a “create” button.
A person sees a piece of art and is inspired. They understand what they see, be it a rose bush to paint or a story beat to work on. This inspiration leads to actual decisions being made with a conscious aim to create art.
An AI, on the other hand, sees a rose bush and adds it to its rose bush catalog, reads a story beat and adds to to its story database. These databases are then shuffled and things are picked out, with no mind involved whatsoever.
A person knows why a rose bush is beautiful, and internalises that thought to create art. They know why a story beat is moving, and can draw out emotional connections. An AI can’t do either of these.
The creative process necessarily involves abandoning bad ideas and refining to something more intentional
“It’s not on the left nor the top” implies you were expecting to find something in the top left. Nowhere are you told to look in the top left.
That’s exactly what you said. How did i misread?
Why won’t you just answer? You’re the one dragging this out
You’ve taken it?