PitLoversNeedMeds

It does sound like the US…

Then stop being American. Easy fix.

Honest feedback, I’d absolutely hate it. Just like I absolutely hated all attempts to centralise shit like social media apps.

Normal human thing. Not ADHD specific.

No you didn’t. You probably didn’t bother checking before running your mouth and now that you’ve been caught being an asshole you’re doing the republican trademark “can’t you take a joke?”

Fair enough! Thanks for the detailed write-up

What about PostgreSQL?

Exactly! So many people assume the science of economics is unfounded because of what some purported “economists” say online or because of some already-irrelevant methodologies the science has abandoned for years already…

The most egregious problem being assuming that the methodology isn’t sound and scientific, and that it instead depends on the whims of the researcher (here they would place researcher in quotation marks, I imagine).

I have had to do game theory, statistics, econometrics, data science (thanks to my chosen specialisation), a lot of math especially about optimisations and linear algebra… And the quality of the academic research is empirical. Rarely will you even find a paper that only uses qualitative data in economics, except maybe in the behavioural economics field. Most often we use natural experiments to replicate RCTs within a macro environment, or double-blind experiments to investigate an economic agent’s systemic preferences and responses within a micro environment…

People who complain about the superficiality of the “soft sciences” have never stepped foot in a class beyond the very basics of that subject taught in highschool. They therefore project their current knowledge on the entire field, marring it…

I hate this :'|

Funny you should say that, because those very humanities aspects of what I studied, Economics, lead STEM students to disparage it as a non-scientific field built of gospel and tenets. As if Humanities diminished the quality of the research and teaching within the Economics field.

So while I agree, and it’s good to see you being upvoted, in a different scenario the application of your thoughts about this will lead the person sharing their experience to get massively downvoted in an attempt to shame them for studying a “soft science”.

Yes, it turns out downvotes are useful when they make a troll mad. The typical troll never gives up on the last word either.

And you’re back down to your usual drivel. Didn’t take long.

Enjoy the false sense of superiority, it’s all you’ll get, clown.

Yes, apparently downvotes are childish, who knew.

Anyway, if you can’t connect the dots between “coming from a different […] group” as well as “strange and not familiar” with autism being a smaller % of the total population than those not on the spectrum, I’m afraid your dishonesty goes even further than I thought it did initially.

It is not incorrect, as always, politically motivated people ignore context when quoting. I was replying to someone calling everyone other than those on the spectrum “aliens”, as they argued that every person on the spectrum was more “logical” (whatever that means, it’s its own can of worms).

So as I replied to them, I explained that whatever they were trying to say, the alien in question would be the one who made up the smallest % of population, as I was following the definitions of “alien” which say:

“strange and not familiar” as well as “coming from a different country, race, or group”, which you conveniently ignored. (same link as yours, btw, so don’t bother arguing a lack of source)

So stop trying to be intellectual, it’s clearly a failure.

Neither is wrong. Deal with it or not, what do I care.

If you’re the minority, you’re the alien.

E: downvoting the truth is petulant and childish. So much for being the “logical” ones.

Right alongside gender fluid.

Would love to know, my friend purchased one and it’s still within the return window.

Ah yes, paying less is bad. Viva capitalism. /s

Are you daft or dumb? Pick one.