I use mine as an ebook reader and to watch netflix et al. especially when I’m traveling. It was only 200€ for a very good 10" display, good sound and decent speed. Pretty good value for money and a lot more comfortable for me than a laptop for these use cases. It’s not the most important device I own but it has its uses.

You should get out of the US more

They are both, it’s not contradictory

You could even remove 5 more words

but it’s his legal right.

One of the stupidest laws in existence

Deepl is great for whole sentences but these systems usually have problems with singular words because they don’t understand the context. That’s usually the problem I see with automatically translated sites. E.g. for English to German, if you have a Home button on your site and just let the tool translate “home”, you get these options:

(Correct one in red, you wouldn’t translate it)

True, but try to get them published

That’s the kind of manager that also tells you that you just lack creativity and vision if you tell them that it’s not possible. They also post regularly on LinkedIn

No, they didn’t. It was a toss up in all polls right till the end with a slight tendency towards Trump. The polls were pretty much on the nose

You are really that gullible, huh?

Close but no. As I said, you’re not actually qualified to discuss with the adults especially if you can’t see how this is relevant here.

Oh my god, do you seriously think you can analyse laws and case law of a different country in a different language if we’re just gonna link the articles?

Well, if you like you can read §111 Strafgesetzbuch but in German legalese and not in a google translated version please. To see how this law is interpreted, you could read this relevant court decision: https://openjur.de/u/2271522.html

The court opinion is interesting, because the posters were lawful because they wrote “Nazis töten.” and not “Nazis töten!” which leads to the posters not being actionable. Do you see the difference? Do you understand the fine line the party “Die Partei” walked here?

There’s a difference of fighting back including killing to defeat an enemy or denying someone the basic right to life.

The first means you fight back until you defeat the enemy, the second one means after you defeat them you round them up and put them in camps to exterminate them.

It also means it limits your actions to those targets who actually hold power and not just anyone who has a Trump / Vance flag in their garden.

I don’t think the paradox of tolerance works here. Popper argued that a truly tolerant society must retain the right to deny tolerance to those who promote intolerance. It doesn’t say kill them, it says don’t tolerate them. Meaning exclude these topics from public discourse or make basic right non-negotiable and unalterable. One of these basic rights being the right to life. Ironically, by calling into question such a basic right, you are actually the intolerant one Popper means.

Of course, this only applies as long as we are still in a tolerant society. A better argument at the moment especially in the US would be the right to resist.

You’re not gonna see this as you blocked feddit.org, also geh dahin wo der Pfeffer wächst!

For everyone else:

Saying “nazi lives don’t matter” isn’t even “dehumanizing”.

Doubtful from a legal point of view

Dehumanization is Trump calling immigrants rapists and criminals, and associating them with insects, rodents, and pests.

Dehumanization is banning every government department from acknowledging the existence of women, LGBTQ+, minorities, etc, and ordering them to erase any mention of their history.

Basically everyone on feddit.org agrees with this, so this whole rambling doesn’t make any sense. Two things can be true at the same time.

I guess that’s a no

As they blocked feddit.org, they’re not gonna see your comment I’d assume

Can you be less annoying? No one owes you anything here.

You are misrepresenting the facts here. Nobody said that calling Nazis pieces of shit is actionable under German law. That’s not the problem. The post specifically states that “Nazi lives don’t matter”, questioning a person’s right to life is dehumanizing and might very well break German law. I’m not a lawyer, so I’m not gonna quote specific case law but if I were an admin, I’d also would err on the side of caution here.

Of all the people who lost or will lose their job because of Musk, those who actively chose to work for him are not on the top of my sympathy list. Not to say that they are not on that list, but they are very close to the bottom.

I agree, he’s not driving it like Musk, so not as bad, he’s just following the new government direction. He’s just a spineless sycophant, and he would switch opinions as soon as the government would change. Still, his changes to the meta apps have an even worse impact than Xitter, because those apps are actually used by a large part of the global population. DOGE’s impact of course is worse though.