I don’t know the Immich API, but I’ve seen several REST APIs that used the usual pattern of

GET /api/v1/user/<id> - read user
POST /api/v1/user/ - create user
...

but also allowed

GET /api/v1/user/<id> - read user
GET /api/v1/user/?action=create - create user
...

Don’t worry. When the time is right (e.g. when there’s some oil to be found) the USA will invade them and bring them democ… oh…

I swear, I just need 4-5 more graphics cards to solve this!

Have you tried adding a few more kilobytes of regex?

Or, hear me out: Set the desired result first and then let them vote, but count what you planned and not the ballots!

reloads, cocks gun Yeah, let’s give it another shot!

A crime a day keep the prosecution away

See, he called it back then! He knew he would be campaigning against Harris! It’s a prophecy!

A PERSON moderates a debate of a MAN and a WOMAN on TV - obviously they’re in front of a CAMERA for it.

What else would it mean?

/s

Well, they did it anyways, so…

Also this might work as an answer to “yeah, it’s a bug, but we won’t pay you”

I mean…

Evangelicals Are Now Rejecting ‘Liberal’ Teachings of Jesus

I couldn’t help but find it amusing—they were now asking me to keep the report confidential, despite having initially dismissed it as out of scope.

“Sorry, but per your own guidelines this is out of scope. Because of this, this bug is not part of the agreement and guidelines on Hackerone. You can find my full disclosure, that I wrote after your dismissal here: <Link>” /s

He’s got concepts of good health vitals

Its all fun and games until the pearlfish decides it’s time to go home ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Land of the free, home of the (wage) brslaves

Already feels like this sometimes

Source?

Imagine getting a 404 or 500 error. Then archiving that on archive.org (and screenshot that dialog on steam) and accept the terms. If there’s any problem and they say you violated the EULA, point them to the terms you accepted.

Yes, it’s just Oracle - Temurin, Coretto,… are all safe.

Oracle offers (paid) support for its Java distribution, which might be why it’s still used by companies…

Worse yet. They switched licensing and costs several times and companies should prepare to get hit with new licensing fees:

When they introduced Java 17 (a LTS version), they published it under the NTFC license. This means, this version is usable for free, but only until the next LTS version has been out for a year.

On Sep 19th 2023, Java 21 was released another LTS version. That means, that Java 17 just switched from the NTFC license to the OTNLA license a few days ago - which means, Java 17 is supported until 2029 but you now need a paid license to use it.

Hope everyone upgraded to Java 21 or newer in time.

Unless you were the one writing the program and its error messages - then check, that you didn’t mess up there…

Some also taste like chicken, I’ve heard.