As long as he doesn’t kidnap some child and make Saru think it’s his.

I know nothing about the dude on the far right

Can’t tell you anything about the character, but that’s Leoben Conoy/Number Two. I guess this time around, the river of time pulled him into a different franchise.

Welp, I totally misunderstood the question then. Sorry.

Have you tried emailing the authors? It’s well known that some folks will gladly respond with a copy of the paper at no charge.

Well darn, Junkball always does SPACE ROCKS! in their starship restrictive videos.

TWOK’s nebula submarine hunt is my favorite Star Trek battle because it actually takes place in three dimensions.

Fellow Junkball fan?

What about the rocks, though? It always seems like a starship is built around a massive quarry.

Honestly, the No True Scotsman fallacy should be renamed the No True Libertarian. Ask one hundred libertarians what a libertarian is, and you’ll get two thousand different answers. So it’s no shock this guy “isn’t a real libertarian”.

Oh man, could you imagine how much better that episode would have been if Worf had intentionally missed, looked at Sisko, and shrugged?

Even Worf misses with a torpedo or two. lol

And yet you still misspelled it, lol. Geordi, not Gordie, not Jordie.

*Geordi.

Burton directed over two dozen episodes across the Trek franchise. While Frakes is more prolific, ironically Burton directed my two favorite Riker episodes, “Second Chances” and “The Pegasus”.

I’m not even sure what it is you’re attempting to ask.

Oh, they have enough food for 2+ million people?

“Nobody’s perfect” makes it sound like the UN was corrupted. It was never about all nations having equal say. It is functioning as intended by the post-WWII major colonial powers. You, I, and everyone who was ever told that the UN was there to make the world more fair and to give everyone equal say bought into a lie the UN successfully sold us.

The “people who envisioned it”, however, were imperialists. They merely claimed that’s what they wanted the UN to be to make it more palatable to those who would fall under the control and influence of the Big 5. The UN has always been, and will always be, a tool of imperialism as long as there are countries that have the ability to rule by minority (see the vote for a ceasefire in Gaza. Only three counties did not vote in favor. Ukraine abstained, and the US and Israel voted against. Because the US has veto power, it didn’t pass )

Nah, because while the UN is a good idea in theory, it’s just an extension of the American empire as it is currently organized.

And then does nothing to stop it because it’s being held hostage by the US.

One has nukes. The other doesn’t have a standing military. They’re not “similar enough” at all.