• 1 Post
  • 53 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 7th, 2025

help-circle

  • Let me reply again to you comment.

    The same cannot be said of flatpaks. AUR stands for Arch User Repo, which is a user-driven unofficial package source. Flatpak on the other hand has some official channels for certain software applications like Firefox for example.

    Now I’ve never used Arch or AUR, so correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think AUR has official software channels like flatpak does. Right?

    If I’m right, flatpak definitely is a lot safer than AUR. As long as you don’t download your flatpaks from unofficial channels. This is actually a good advantage for Snaps which are thoroughly checked by Canonical.







  • The New Balance 574. I’ve tried replacing them with similar shoes from other brands, even Asics which are considered good. But, nothing feels better on me feet.

    They have a great sole that’s just right. Not too hard that it’ll hurt your whole back, knees and feet, but not too soft that you’ll sink heel first into them either.

    The heel is raised just a little which seems to relieve a lot of tension in my lower back. It also supports my feet’s arch which relieves tension in my feet also. They’re usually pretty durable, though I found the build quality to have decreased in the past 5 years. The sole also doesn’t last as long as it used to.









  • That’s a really good article and they highlight exactly what my problem is with these kind of distribution.

    “Use Linux so you can have total control of your system!”

    * takes away the ability to have total control over my system.

    Like wtf.

    And how do you explain to your aging parents why their applications aren’t available because it’s not containerized?

    I dunno. It’s got its applications, like on systems where the specs are all the same, like the Macs or Steam deck or tablets. But to me that doesn’t make sense on a PC.

    If you want to leave your system folders alone, just don’t SUDO.



  • The buildings they built there are way too high and blocks the view of Montreal from the Canal, blocks sunlight, and makes the neighborhood feel claustrophobic. The buildings are also very ugly when you compare to the historical architectural heritage of Montreal. I feel there was no real effort made to make these buildings appealing with a timeless design. It’s all built cheap and quick. There are virtually no services there to accomodate the huge influx of people who moved there either. Finally the local infrastructure is struggling to keep up. Not just in terms of roads (the traffic is INTENSE around that area), but also for the aqueducts, sewers, and electricity.

    It should have been made shorter as some commented, but also other neighborhoods should have been developed more. up to 10 storeys is ok, but the high rise ones are blocking the whole view of the skyline of the city, especially from the Canal area.

    And one last argument against the high rise apartment buildings is that it’s such a fucking pain to manage on so many levels. It’s hard to get a quorum when doing general assemblies to make important decisions because the majority of the owners aren’t even here. They’re mostly from other provinces or even other countries. There are also a LOT of problems with the plumbing. Due to the high pressure required to push the water up these towers, every unit has a regulator. These things fail very frequently and often before their intended end of life. When you have a leak that spans several levels in a building, it’s so difficult to manage and orchestrate the repairs and compensation for affected residents. They’re a nightmare to manage.

    Meanwhile you have the rich people living in Westmount in their single family town homes in prime real estate areas that could be densified to accomodate more people, but hey… They’re rich. They have influence. It’s easier to kick out the poor from their old apartment buildings and rebuild therea and destroy whatever architectural heritage there might have been.