But also phrased in such a way that anti-vaxxers can’t hide behind some flimsy excuse and endanger us all
But also phrased in such a way that anti-vaxxers can’t hide behind some flimsy excuse and endanger us all
This just feels like a bunch of tech bros found an excuse to vote for the fascist convicted felon/rapist without saying the quiet part too loudly. Like, they have to know the fascists won’t allow anything unregulated by them to exist if they take power, right?
Curious which American election observers are neutral parties then, if you refuse to believe that the Carter Center is unbiased. Because I’ll bet you I can use similar mental gymnastics to tie every single American election observer to one side or the other (or even both, just for fun).
He was wearing one. Later in the BBC article it mentions him posting pictures of his ruined helmet on twitter Instagram
The better phrasing is definitely “Questioning science in good faith is science”
Never forget the 1992 mathssacre.
But also, they build the guidance systems for hellfire missiles.
Don’t forget about good ol’ Texas Instruments
Well Castro came to power via revolution in 1959, which pissed off the US, and started the push towards the Soviet Union. The nation also hosted Soviet nukes for a very brief time in 1962.
More detailed timeline found here, if you’re interested.
Operation Praying Mantis II: Naval Boogaloo?
In all likelihood, they’ve been open for business to make it easier to nab intellectual property from the rightful owners. China has probably just decided they’ve learned enough to make their own “homegrown” products, and can safely kick all the western businesses out of the market.
Removed by mod
Either South Korea or Vietnam! Not China, surprisingly!
I mean, similar to that argument, I’m not using Chinese software/hardware, so at least I’m doing something?
The only guarantee for privacy is to not be online at all, but that ship has sailed for all of us
Every country tries to hack each other. Doesn’t mean we should make it easy for them.
Near as I can tell, Iran sold the plane to Venezuela in 2022, but it has been grounded in Argentina since then [for some reason I don’t quite get]. Argentina is trying to score brownie points with the US, so they handed the plane over to Washington, and that’s how we got this headline.
Because, as the warships are US flagged, all that matters for their conduct (until a UN resolution is passed or ICC takes action) is US Law.
Since the USN vessels are not within the internationally recognized jurisdiction of Yemen, Yemeni laws don’t apply. So it can’t really be illegal, then? Or is the law that no one, anywhere on earth, is allowed to disagree with them?
Yes it does. Look up the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, if you’re not being purposefully obtuse.
And as much as we may not like it, with the way US laws currently are, there is nothing illegal about USN vessels being in the Red Sea
Yes it does. Ships of any nation have a right to transit international waters.
When Iranian ships (or ships of any nation, really) engage in acts of privacy, then they open themselves up to the consequences, whatever those may be.
If a ship is in international waters, it has every right to be there, regardless of nationalities involved.
Not only just to trap Trump, but also to coalesce everyone behind a successor candidate. Because the only thing worse than Biden staying in the race would have been him dropping out and then a dozen Democrat candidates popping up, vying for the nomination, barely 5 months before the election. Further infighting would have handed the election to the weirdos.