Is it okay if I only pee’d a little?

I’d say entitled is a more apt description.

Saying this again for those on the back that may not be listening.

All you folks who are wondering why Harris was so eager to work with the Cheneys and other Republicans and move further to the center, this is why. That 5% probably makes up a good portion of the difference between this poll and prior polls

Astutely put!

What is the deal with The Daily Beast reporting on reports already made by different sources?

This is just an article about a report made by Axios. Am I missing something?

Nailed it.

One in ten Bernie Bros voted for Trump in 2016. So maybe let’s not talk about people not learning their lessons.

But they are garbage. There’s no high road to take here. It’s just a road. And it’s littered with garbage Trump supporters.

Proud of my city!

He said that in 2020. He was supposed to leave America if I remember correctly.

The question is, can it grow to a point that will put a big enough dent in their profits to matter…

So, now we know why the conservatives are so hell-bent on defunding the education system In America…

It’s for votes!

“The major problem—one of the major problems, for there are several—one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them.

To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it.

To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.”

~ Douglas Adams

And the other half love him for it.

We don’t get to live in the ‘what should-be’ reality. We have to live in the ‘what is’ reality.

Vote as if none of this is accurate or relevant. There’s a good chance it isn’t.

Better yet- Pretend it doesn’t exist.

… briefly “worked” at.

Voting is the only accurate means to determine a president. This bullshit with odds and predictions muddies the water.

So based on their record over the past two years, it’s safe to say that whoever they assume to have the best odds of winning- it’s still going to be a whoever wins, wins.

My point is… they’re not accurate.

Their odds predicted the past two elections wrong. What part of this is not getting through?

There wasn’t a five in six chance for the candidates during either of the previous two elections. So I’m ignoring your example.

They were wrong. Twice. Enough said.

Oh I understand it just fine. Fine enough not to rely on polling to indicate anything. 538 isn’t accurate. Why is that up for debate?

Odds can’t be wrong?