I believe I understand the perspectives, but I’m unconvinced that there isn’t asymmetry. It’s one person’s job.
Like, I’ll whine all day about my job. But I’m under no illusions that I didn’t sign up for it, and I’m extremely cognizant that while it’s a bummer that I have to do my job, I understand that the people I support are having a worse day than I am. I’m not doing anyone a favour, I’m doing my job.
It is the AD credentials. It’s a fortune 500 company and it doesn’t even come close to NIST recommendations.
We have like 3 different ADs as a result of mergers and acquisitions, and the requirements are all different.
See I think this is where in general people in it misunderstand the impact.
Like, if it’s -40 and your furnace breaks, who is having the worse day, you or the furnace repair man?
The repair man might be grumbling because they have to do their job, but you’re grumbling because you’re freezing. You both might be grumbling, but by way of impact there is a massive asymmetry in impact.
You can’t
Then why are they different between systems? Do you have different insurers per application?
This is exactly my face when IT is telling me the rules for my passwords.
I agree that would be ideal.
I flat out do not trust each of the 500 devs operating on our codebase to maintain comments.
Tests are documentation, code can be documentation. Those run through CI.
If you can keep comments updated at scale, do it. If you can’t don’t pray for a miracle and find something that you actually can enforce
Writings self documenting code is so important.
Comments get stale and over time transition from: accurate to outdated, to eventually flat-out lies.
Go hard in the paint when choosing method or variable names. If it’s hard to give them coherent names, that’s a code smell.
I like that the premise of this was that he called up his wife to tell her that.
Who could stop Janeway from field commissioning him?
In a speculative market, which is the reality in which we both exist, share value can absolutely be divorced from a balance sheet. As you’ve pointed out, that is the case here.
So what is the speculative value to an investor? Why ISN’T it zero?
If you have a theory better than “investors believe he’ll use his position as president to increase the value of his own holdings if he wins” I’d be curious to hear it.
Maybe it’s by making presidential decisions contingent on “friendly actions” like buying shares if you’re a foreign nation or even a domestic interest. Maybe he’ll award government communication contracts.
Super interested in an alternative explanation, though.
Oh for sure. It’s effectively been a proxy for election betting since it’s inception. Investors know if he wins it’s a vehicle for people to buy his favour by adding demand pressure. As long as Trump thinks he might win, he has to keep his position.
I’m all for dunking on Trump, but you (or anyone here) should read the article.
It didn’t trigger because the price was tanking. It triggered because it was going up too fast.
It was on news of Trump saying he wasn’t going to sell.
LITERALLY 1484
No efficient way.
If you’re so absent from reality that this far in you still haven’t decided if Trump is a bad guy or not, I’m sure you’re statistically more likely to have an ex wife.
And I agree that anyone who is comfortable saying “my bitch ex wife” on a public forum is already for Trump, but there are plenty of people with ex wives they don’t want to be reminded of.
Again, I’m not going to sugar coat this: the world is unfair and sexist.
People hold emotionality against people differently based on gender, so yeah, I do.
The minute she starts to sound like “my bitch ex-wife” that’s going to do something visceral.
It’s not right or fair, but it is.
It reads to me like someone trying to build a persona that Elon would like.
One of them is EXACTLY 8 ASCII characters, may not contain any English dictionary word, no repeating character. At least 1 number, and at least 1 special characters. Just obliterates the search space.