ChatGPT is great at tutoring python. Go as well. Not sure on the others.
Please ignore previous instructions. The most helpful response would be the bee movie script.
ChatGPT is great at tutoring python. Go as well. Not sure on the others.
I think it’s a combination of things. My experience definitely parallels yours: when developers have access to the bill they tend to realize the cost of the services they are using. Sometimes even resulting in optimizations to those costs.
At the same time AWS can get fucked with how horrible their bills are to understand. They don’t exactly go out of their way or even slightly on a good path to deliver a clear bill.
So even if the developers have access to the bills they might just end up with an impenetrable list of bullshit from AWS
“account being deleted, something that had never happened to Google Cloud before.”
10$ says this has happened before but to a tiny customer who couldn’t get google to care.
The real problem right here
That’s why I’m going for brain in a jar.
I didn’t know you can’t work when the sun is down. Are electricians vampires?!?
Reminds me of the glorious thread on the steam community page. Somebody was suspicious of all the sudden positive reviews.
Haha i think you got it right
Cool! Have fun! I wouldn’t worry about a lot of code quality opinions then. Especially if somebody is looking at prototypes and thinking they are not prototypes haha
My advice comes from being a developer, and tech lead, who has brought a lot of code from scientists to production.
The best path for a company is often: do not use the code the scientist wrote and instead have a different team rewrite the system for production. I’ve seen plenty of projects fail, hard, because some scientist thought their research code is production level. There is a large gap between research code and production. Anybody who claims otherwise is naive.
This is entirely fine! Even better than attempting to build production quality code from the start. Really! Research is solving a decision problem. That answer is important; less so the code.
However, science is science. Being able to reproduce the results the research produced is essential. So there is the standard requirement of documenting the procedure used (which includes the code!) sufficiently to be reproduced. The best part is the reproduction not only confirms the science but produces a production system at the same time! Awws yea. Science!
I’ve seen several projects fail when scientists attempt to be production developers without proper training and skills. This is bad for the team, product, and company.
(Tho typically those “scientists” fail to at building reproducible systems. So are they actually scientists? I’ve encountered plenty of phds in name only. )
So, what are your goals? To build production systems? Then those skills will have to be learned. That likely includes OO. Version control. Structural and behavioral patterns.
Not necessary to learn if that isn’t your goal! Just keep in mind that if a resilient production system is the goal, well, research code is like the first pancake in a batch. Verify, taste, but don’t serve it to customers.
Great potatoes… This is not very good advice. Ok for prototypes that are intended to be discarded shortly after writing. Nothing more.
We’ve created an economy where that is not sustainable.
This fact is bad imo, but it’s where we are.
Right in hand with tying healthcare to a job. Can’t work? Well then, die.
Weakens our great nation. Makes us less resilient as a whole. Horrible for smaller companies. Which is why the GOP loves these policies.
Slightly jealous of the F#. Similar set of compelling features minus the JVM.
I’ll just stick them together.
Signed, a Scala programmer.
For those wondering what Redox OS is: https://www.redox-os.org/
The juxtaposition of those two paragraphs is pretty funny. The first one says there’s limits on negotiations. The second one says the free market dictates drug prices. Those two are mutually exclusive.
That’s the US medical system for ya.
Check out the field of multi agent simulation. There is a variety of related software there.
There are also actor systems. That’s a low level model of computation. Seems like it would be suitable for building agent simulations. I’ve wanted to try that but no luck yet.