That’s rather optimistic. I’m pretty sure it’s daily. Although, perhaps it’s only once a month that it gets upvoted
That’s rather optimistic. I’m pretty sure it’s daily. Although, perhaps it’s only once a month that it gets upvoted
Yep, the citizens are now far smarter in their path finding. They’ll walk quite a distance now, or follow a route via multiple different transport types.
A feature I’m really enjoying is pedestrians will walk along routes not intended for them if you’ve failed to provide adequate pedestrian routes. They will walk alongside a highway without a pavement if it saves them time. Or even more recklessly I’ve got people finding their way onto my rail tracks to shortcut their way to the station in places I’ve failed to put pedestrian paths.
Each citizen has their own preferences too, They’ll take whatever transport is most suited to them. There’s a surprising amount of depth to it.
When traveling by car or public transport they choose:
Teens - the cheapest route.
Adults - the quickest route.
Seniors - the most comfortable route.
https://cs2.paradoxwikis.com/Citizens#Age
This cost is calculated using multiple factors such as the city’s road network, traveling time, travel cost, agent preferences, and more which we will cover in more detail below. Furthermore, agents will adjust their route based on events along the way. They may change lanes to avoid a car accident or a stopped service vehicle or make room for a vehicle responding to an emergency.
https://cs2.paradoxwikis.com/Traffic
Cars have seen massive improvement as well. They do indeed now pull into another lane to make way for emergency vehicles.
No longer do citizens store them in a magical pocket, they need to find parking which can be roadside or in dedicated parking structures.
Roads can be upgraded to remove roadside parking, given wide pavements, you can add signage to prevent left hand turns etc. But rather enjoyably some more reckless drivers will ignore your road layouts and intentionally take turns they aren’t allowed to, or if a road becomes blocked they will perform an illegal u-turn and find an alternative route.
Honestly, I’m really not understanding why this game is getting so many people complaining. Sure it has bugs, but the core mechanics are working perfectly fine - it’s an incredible feat of software engineering.
Interesting. It looks like that was the case in the past but they eventually adapted https://vimeo.com/blog/post/new-upload-rules/
What phrasing are you saying is dishonest? A quick search of proton student discount doesn’t even bring up any results from them
My mantra has always been to bring solutions not problems. Applying that to code reviews makes for a far more productive experience.
Rather than just pointing out errors in code help the developer with prompts towards the solution.
Or, if you’re too lazy to explain why something shouldn’t be done then why should another developer have to act on your criticism?
I wish this had been my experience. I pushed for so long in my last company for standards to be written, code formatters implemented and objectivity to be brought to reviews but it was always ignored.
Instead I had to endure every employee who claimed seniority (in a non hierarchical company) subjecting their opinion on style in reviews. It came up the point that I dreaded having to work with specific people because they kept triggering my PTSD with their moving target of micro management.
Only afterwards did I truly appreciate how poor a lot of their opinions were. Now one of my first questions when approaching a new project is what standards we’re following. If they look at me blank faced that’s a pretty solid red flag.
I never understand apps like this. Surely if you’re looking for this level of feature you may as well just use a GUI?
Do you mean rel="nofollow"
?
I used to see this a lot with Facebook. Every time they altered the design people would kick up a fuss and I never understood why, the new design always looked far better.
Nowadays of course I don’t use Facebook but will occasionally have to sign in to look up the details of a business or something. The design has of course changed and I can’t find a damn thing on it. So I’m finally on board with the masses.
But they aren’t getting forced to change accounts. Their service continues just under another provider.
People who use the default email their ISP gives them don’t like change. The new service will probably have a different login screen and that’s going to upset aunty Ethel and uncle ron. And then a different colour background. It’s the worst thing that anyone could ever do to them
deleted by creator
That’s what I was questioning. Why do do the work but then not make it accessible?
It’s a similar thought to this topic: https://lemmy.world/post/3179113
My main issue with this is it requires a cheat sheet just to view a cheat sheet.
I’ll rephrase. Why require an editor? The most common viewers of SVG do not support layers.
I’ll rephrase. Why require an editor? The most common viewers of SVG do not support layers
Why not export them rather than requiring people to install Inkscape just to view the files?
I imagine most single developer projects lack any design or UX so the screenshot would do little to encourage users to download.
Ubuntu because it requires the least amount of hack fixes to get working.
And snap has vastly simplified software installation.