This was an issue on Samsung devices last year, but the OneUI 6.1 update ended up fixing it for me.

My initial bug report:

https://lemmy.world/post/9269197

My post after the bug was fixed:

https://lemmy.world/post/15496619

Device information

Sync version: v24.03.26-14:56    
Sync flavor: googlePlay    

Ultra user: true    
View type: List    
Push enabled: false    

Device: p3q    
Model: samsung SM-G998U    
Android: 14

Weird, I am on Android as well and all I see is the ol’ X in a box.

Maybe it’s a Google phone only thing.

It’s just a shame that they failed to see what made the original Wii Sports so successful: it came with the console.

If they had Switch Sports available on day 1, free for all Switch owners, and then added DLC on top of that, they’d have made a mint.

the main difference in many third party Switch games compared to their MS/Sony counterparts is mostly just running at 30 vs 60 FPS with no other major graphical or gameplay changes.

I would disagree on this point.

Many third party games that release on Sony/Microsoft consoles and Switch do feature noticeably downgraded graphics, even comparing PS4/Xbox One to the Switch. Whether that prevents someone from enjoying those games is entirely down to personal preference, but I think it is disingenuous to say that the framerate and resolution are the only differences.

Take a look at the Digital Foundry comparison between The Witcher 3 on Switch versus (standard) PS4 and you’ll see a good example of all the optimizations and trimming that they had to do to get the Switch version running at passable framerates. It still runs well, and it’s still a fun game, but if someone is looking for high visual fidelity, they’d be better served with any other platform (and notably, the PS5/Xbox Series received visual enhancements to take advantage of the better hardware for their respective ports of the game).

It’s not as common as the Wii days, but the Switch still does see neutered versions of some games ported to the system. Kingdom Hearts 3, for example, doesn’t even run on the console. The Switch just streams it from the cloud. So when those servers eventually go down, that’s it, no more game. It’ll be effectively un-released. EA never stopped the old strategy for their FIFA games either (while they still had the rights to that franchise) where the Switch versions of the game were simply missing features available on other platforms for some arbitrary reason.

…to singularly focus on a cheaper model, The Information reports.

They always gotta leave the important bits out of the headline.

This was the surprise of the Direct for me. Beautiful style, and the gameplay seems very reminiscent of Ori, which I loved.

If they offered you 20,000 more than what you expected, might be you are underselling your actual worth and could have negotiated for more.

It’s sad that this has basically become a standard. Subscribe to a service, but then you have to pay extra on top of that to not see ads. Are we now supposed to be grateful that products and services we already pay for aren’t trying to bleed us for every cent they can get?

Fuck everyone in Japan that defends the war atrocities the government committed. If this seems like a harsh take, it is only proportional to how abhorrent those atrocities were.

That shrine should be burned.

“Pwease give us access to your contacts UwU. We wanna find ur friends. All of them.”

I would say in one sense yes, because typically property being bequeathed follows different customs than property being sold for profit.

But the point in this case is that your Steam library is not even “property” to begin with, it is a contract that becomes invalid when one of the parties (the customer) dies.

Not with Sync at least

They didn’t say that though, they said the only game.

Are you having

Yeah maybe you’re not the most qualified to poke at the writing of others.

I don’t think we’ve heard enough about Metroid Prime to bet on it being a Switch 2 launch title. I am thinking the upcoming Pokemon Legends is the likelier option, which already has a 2025 release window.

That does look better.

For the drag and drop space, however, would a simple “Right Click > Open In” not be easier? Or just dragging the file over the application on the taskbar?

I have not used either, but I can say that Krita’s UI is closer to Photoshop than GIMP’s appears to be. That might be why people are opting for that application, for the sense of familiarity if they were trained on Photoshop.

I will say that any application which is used for digital painting should also be good at image manipulation, so if Krita does both well, I can see why it would be preferred over GIMP if the painting tools are lacking.

Looking over the screenshots, for GIMP, I am hoping that is not the default layout of tools. Having a jumbled block of icons is a lot harder to visually parse than a stack of pairs. I also find myself wondering why they use up so much space on the left to include a weird cutout of their mascot above the tools.

On the right, I am also not sure why the layer thumbnails are pushed so far to the right when they could be immediately adjacent to the visibility toggle.

It doesn’t look terrible to me, but I am not surprised that people using an app for visual design might be more critical of design flaws in the app itself.

Interesting, I didn’t even know that button was there. I must have seen it once, turned it off, then forgot about it. My normal view looks more like this:

Maybe my client is set up differently, but do you not need to swipe open the left-side menu to post, which shows at the top what account is currently being used?

Romancelandia.club appears to be a Mastodon instance. Seems to me like this is the result of beginning a post with a hashtag, which markdown formatting styles as a header.

Simple solution, I would think, is to disable markdown formatting for titles.