Mostly harmless

  • 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle

  • SonnyVabitch@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzDawkins
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s probably from an hour long portrait interview, in which they cover a lot of ground including favourite English literary pieces, and the interviewer tries to tie it to the guest. They would probably ask David Beckham which Harry Potter character he’d have on his football team.









  • Maybe, this sentence, out of context. The rest of the post makes it abundantly clear that the ages of these things go:
    mountains -> bones -> dinosaurs

    The poster may either be a victim of Poe’s Law, in which case their “joke” wasn’t very funny, or they could be making the logical deduction as you describe but as a mistake. I thought it was the latter.


  • The original sentence is consistent with the assertion that the mountains had formed before the first boney ancestors of dinosaurs evolved. This is also consistent with the presented timeline.

    The correction would mean that the mountains may be older or younger than dinosaurs, because they are only older than bones, and the article is deafeningly silent on the issue of whether dinosaurs had bones.

    It’s a failure of literacy on the poster’s part, hence the downvotes.