![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/b3d816d0-88b2-4dd6-8370-9bd51e5612a7.png)
chaos goblins.
Thank you very much. A new character idea.
chaos goblins.
Thank you very much. A new character idea.
“Help! Help! I am being held accountable for my actions. The whole woke mob is coming after me and trying to cancel me!”
I’m glad my workplace has a cat. Although, the cat does cat like things at the most inopportune moments.
Give Chiquita a chance, they will eventually learn how to truly commit war crimes and crimes against humanity.
That’s when you find yourself asking the important question, “What day is it?”
I missed it and wasn’t brought to my attention years later that the movie was satire on fascism. I always took it as a dumb action movie.
Maybe my memory is a bit hazy, but the bugs actually annihilate a city, right?
The bugs were alleged to send an asteroid from another solar system and hit Earth. Logically, the bugs would have to know hundreds of years that they were going to get in a war with the Humans, know how to shoot an asteroid across the galaxy, and know exactly Earth was going to be for the asteroid to hit.
AI comes up with bad ideas just like CEOs.
Sure, science is great and has lead to several great advancements. Science is done by people.
People will lie, cheat, and steal.
Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of p-hacking strategies
In an academic system that promotes a ‘publish or perish’ culture, researchers are incentivized to exploit degrees of freedom in their design, analysis and reporting practices to obtain publishable outcomes [1]. In many empirical research fields, the widespread use of such questionable research practices has damaged the credibility of research results [2–5].
A recent Retraction Watch investigation allegedly identified more than 30 such editors, and kickbacks of as much as US$20,000. Academic publisher Elsevier has confirmed its editors are offered cash to accept manuscripts every single week. The British regulator said in January that one unnamed publisher “had to sack 300 editors for manipulative behaviour”.
AI Chatbots Have Thoroughly Infiltrated Scientific Publishing
At least 60,000 papers—slightly more than 1 percent of all scientific articles published globally last year—may have used an LLM, according to Gray’s analysis, which was released on the preprint server arXiv.org and has yet to be peer-reviewed
It’s important not deify science instead realize that it has issues. We should address those issues to help science become the ideals that we want believe science to have.
Edit: Missed a word
It all goes to the C-Suits and any investors.
Saute in a pan with butter and garlic. Death will taste fabulous.
Who hasn’t done a boatload of LSD and thought to themself “We can communicate with dolphins”.
No judgement here.
Milk is for babies. When you grow up you have to drink beer.
Arnold Schwarzenegger
One flop and they’re axed?
I think this comes from the mindset that if someone isn’t generating immediate success. It’s time to fire them. We see this a lot in sports. Team off to a terrible start with a new coach? Fire the coach and start trading players.
It really highlights how organizations see people as disposable. If people don’t make line go brrr, out the door they go.
Mmmmmmmm, 50,000 potato chips.
This has the vibe of “Grifting a bunch people who have no sense and a way too much money on their hands”. I’m in.
Edit: Missed a word
Considering the man spent over a year working in a blacked-out room, trying to detect the faint spark of electricity transmitted wirelessly, it’s gonna have a song or three about fumbling or stumbling in the dark.
Bruce Springsteen has you covered with “Dancing in the Dark”.
The whale milk must flow.
It’s people downvoting because “Religion = bad”.
When in reality it should be “Religion = institutions and institutions can be either good or bad or mix of both.”
Edit: Spelling
What is this fresh prince you talk about it?