Not every civ game is war all the time…

More of an IRL game of civilization against other liches.

Wipe out a colonized planet, import confused cavemen for each “team”, get into the nitty gritty of civ building from an ageless eye.

Or playing using real people and resources against other liches

Because I needed all the extra time to really finish my game of civilization

Nah, I just already have turned down large chunks of money and changed careers over my moral stance without compromising it. Pretty sure I could do the same, much as Irwin took money from whoever and then turned around and put it into conservation regardless.

I’ll be honest. I would take Aipac money. I can see how there could be an optics issue but as long as I still uphold that Bibi is a war criminal, Palestine should be a country, and the genocide is real/Israel needs to fix and gtfo of occupied areas.

Pretty sure I wouldn’t get donations from Aipac to start but if they’re stupid enough to donate to me I don’t see why I shouldn’t spend their money and go about my business.

Why? It’s only closed to the public, not for official business.

He took control of the purse from congress, he’s attempting to pass laws in the guise of executive orders, he’s shuttering departments and reallocating their resources to other parts of the executive branch, he’s been talking about creating an executive branch police type force… And that’s just the first question you had.

He’s regulating industries through tariffs (which are also a duty of congress and not the president so back to centralizing power for a two-fer)

He’s sending in the military to predominantly liberal/democratic run cities to back up ICE who is under orders from his goon Miller to harass anyone with a non white skin tone.

All easily seen examples if you paid any attention to media coverage, and extremely easy if you’re on the news subs on here…

Anyhow, now that that’s cleared up, kindly quit your bullshit.

Pretty sure we saw that with Luigi too

I haven’t seen any of them praising the assassination of Palestinians though.

Where are these liberals? I’m only seeing celebrations or “I don’t condone but in this case I don’t care either” for the fascist getting shot.

Or were you hearing them condemn gun violence for the school shooting that also occurred today?

Always have been

No, but wait for the presidential proclamation trying to rename it.

I’ll be honest, I was going off the evidence presented in this thread and didn’t follow the links. Dude is definitely a genocide denier and in the wrong but I don’t see the connection between being a hypocrite sealioning about Israel using human shields and being a fascist.

I mean, that doesn’t make them a fascist.

It makes them misinformed and a hypocrite.

Even with the misleading headline, has nobody commenting about how bad it is ever seen how many trees die when set up in low light conditions? These can be used in places trees wouldn’t be effective, and that’s before the whole “they’re better at cleaning the air” bit.

Also really really hard to keep trees alive on the sides of buildings where these units could conceivably be used. Modular trees plus trees where we can fit them.

Trump and Co also put pressure not to allow a deal during the Biden admin so that there wouldn’t be any shared credit. Netanyahu and the Israeli government went along with it because they thought they could get a better deal and so far that looks to be the case considering there hasn’t been any pushback since they violated the ceasefire that was in place and escalated the genocide in the last few months including blocking all aid since shortly after Trump took office. https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-war-ceasefire-hostages-netanyahu-ff48f081b069e484955a72bc68261364

Miss me with that revisionist history.

It wouldn’t be “using every option available” but that doesn’t equal “working tirelessly”.

Words matter especially in this era of misusing words to pretend something else is occurring.

It would be a lie if they said they tried every avenue possible, but they didn’t. They did try with less effective strategies and they should be lambasted for their ineffectiveness but not for “lying they were working tirelessly”. Those are two different standards.