Pycharms warns me about cognitive complexity of functions. Other IDEs too i assume?
Pycharms warns me about cognitive complexity of functions. Other IDEs too i assume?
Yeah, of course font an tool needs to support it. Well ok, maybe we’re not yet there. On the other hand, Emacs and Vim are quite old. It works in Kate, Mousepad, Leafpad… Nano does s-t-r-o-k-e too. Geany does a mix where it displays correctly but each char has two strokes, weird. But that is still good enough.
No.
Ah, you meant implement it myself? Well, maybe in a few years, i have a gazilion other things to work on.
Great question though, it’s actually making me wonder why this isn’t a thing in normal plain text editors!
Right? Why make the text editor Unicode capable but not implement this? Are we too stuck in the xml ways?
Ah damn, proprietary.
And looks like it only pastes? I make an edit.
I mean with rich text, text with bold, indent, etc., not a specific markup. On the contrary, i want to replace markup with native Unicode symbols.
Thanks!
I save it for now, until i work on it again. Possibly the wildcards thing. And that tar includes files of folders given too, from someone else (how to work with that).
Wasn’t there an experiment with lasers and reversing cause and effect?
What, no! Use TOML or something for config files.
It is the work of thousands of people all over the globe. It isn’t trying to be a copy of anything.
There’s a lot of ideology at play here.
It seems that Podman is more lightweight. Less code = less errors. And there are some architectural differences. But i’m only googling stuff.
You don’t support superposition yet?
…I mean, not running monitoring software as container, would be an idea.
I’m aspergers with adhd, so 🤷
- Let’s run a virtual container in
--privileged
mode, so we can manage system resources from it
Seriously?
Pack it with the interpreter in an executable.
Meh, you still drink coffee, yes?