Being good has nothing to do with having to maintain your company’s code base that’s in Oracle’s Java SE 1.6.
You can’t just design your way out of a conflict whose solution is to change either the existing system architecture or change Java versions,
both suggestions will get you laughed out of the room.
Oh man this takes me way back. VB’s pick and drop UI builder was so magical. I used to do complex wizard based forms that are probably terrible if I look at them now (If I still preserved them… unfortunately I didn’t) but at the time they looked professional.
It takes time to implement features. Execs and managers don’t want to implement the wheel and developer time costs a lot more money than security vulns.
The fediverse already has a mechanism to guard against some corporation coming in and taking the code from a platform and building a commercial product on top of it - defederation. We don’t need GPL to “protect” us from anyone here
I disagree. The reason GPL works is that legal action (Such as from GNU foundation or EFF) deters bad actors.
The fediverse already has a mechanism to guard against some corporation coming in and taking the code from a platform and building a commercial product on top of it - defederation.
Defederation only helps the corporations: When the corporation comes in, overwhelms the fediverse with their huge network of active instances and then defederate, the only ones holding the bag are the open intances. . It’s much easier for a private corporation to get numbers to defederate and come out on top than for open source enthusiasts.
However, there are also many that want to be recognized (financially) for their work. GPL ignores the latter.
If you want to be financially recognized for building on top of other people’s open source projects then you should write proprietary code. You shouldn’t be allowed to take open source works freely and call the entirety your own. MIT doesn’t prevent that from happening. GPL prevents that from happening.
I don’t believe that is the case any more
It’s actually really important in the long run. There can never be true open source without GPL or similar legal licenses.
That’s when AI crashes because the secret cabal of middle management will direct their brainwashed execs to divest. /s
Corporate loves to steal ideas and patent it/copyright it so nobody else gets to steal it next, even the original author of a technique.
The caching is kind of mandatory as the sub-problems interact.
Lay off a few C-Suite. Abolish golden parachutes. It’s not so difficult that a company can’t run for a few months without execs.
Lol when GodotOS supports fractional scaling faster than some DEs…
Website: “915 days in a year”, you: “they are well paid and good at their job”. Anyone seeing your comment: 🤨
Yeah sure, better than pulling 1000Gb of node_modules…
Math people don’t have time to delve into modular code with the right amount of encapsulation/abstractions. Their money making is via testing hypotheses by constructing models and experiments.
If you want good code look at people making money writing code.
They probably wanted Streisand effect to take hold and screw this asshole Rajat Khare.
Indian courts are fellating the current govt. hard so complying with their orders is akin to giving their govt. a free pass to suppress dissent and arrest civilians under their notorious UAPA. They use their “enforcement directorate”(shortened to ED) as whips to keep people in line. ED and courts are the lapdog of their government.
It’s going to be quite rare… and I do like that we have better visual warning to users that something went wrong instead of a wall of colorless text.