Is there a difference between the two?

What exactly does this mean?

Overall. They went down in the affected areas.

There was never an explicit deal on providing free shit. Although they seem to be honoring paid stuff. If your account is old enough, content shared with friends can be downloaded even if they don’t have a Plex pass.

If Plex was 100% paid there a would be zero complaints.

Because it’s easier to rely on YouTube than have to pay to permanently host something and all the bandwidth associated with it.

Video hosting is expensive. And IPFS is slow.

When the people who signed up to get shot at get shot at

20 years ago we relied on printed books and libraries. I’ve noticed in real time this last decade [nearly] every paper gaining a PDF download button on some website.

Neat. Thanks.

No ground pin? Is that power port DC?

Want to go so fast they’ll go slow for it.

All I see is the two colors. If I wanted to have to look closely I would have just opted for a list.

What part of tiny pie charts was necessary? Just make a heatmap but in dots.

The headline also leaves out this specific caveat of the study (emphasis mine):

While such measures can yield significant other benefits, and may also reduce traffic volumes locally

So it does have impact on car use. It just hasn’t reduced overall car use because we’re doing too little. Got it.

That is an extremely loaded sentence. It is missing “in the specific example that is current earth”

Oh I see what you meant.

Per customer* cost.

It depends on the service level. Gigabit is something like $30 minimum just due to the fiberoptic hardware and bandwidth egress.

ISPs only cost like $10 a month to run.

VPN providers have to manage less hardware

Pog

It becomes law with or without him