JustSomePerson

deleted by creator

Exercising your rights is perhaps not hostile and confrontational.

Stating “I’m exercising my rights” is.

Or you could choose to not immediately have a hostile and confrontational attitude.

“No” is also a valid answer to “do you know why I stopped you?”

deleted by creator

Enshrining racial differences in the constitution is absolutely disgusting, no matter how good your intentions are.

Nobody is proving an endorsement of monarchy. You’re using monarchy as an argument for adding (additional) racism to the constitution. It’s a fucking stupid argument. “One thing is bad, therefore it is not a problem to make other things worse too.”

If something has a flaw (monarchy) that’s not a reason to make it worse (enshrine racially based representation).

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

It is fucking disgusting to see your defense of racism.

ALL HUMANS HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE TREATED EQUALLY IN THE EYES OF THE LAW!

Everybody should have the same right to be heard. Different people having different rights to be heard, based on their race, is absolutely objectionable. And racist.

That is entirely irrelevant. “The king exists, therefore the constitution should give different rights to regular people based on their race”. Disgusting argument.

Fuck, that’s an awful take. All laws based on race or genetics are always a bad idea.

Grow the fuck up. You are the one arguing for race-based legislation. That makes you the racist. Every human has the right to be equal in the eyes of the law. There simply cannot be an excuse for having tests based on genetics that lead to different rights in a society. That’s just purely despicable in every way.

When you choose to use the expression “absolutely no reason”, it is trivially easy to disprove your claim. My argument is one of them, and it is a valid reason to vote no. Your further arguments are valid reasons to vote “yes”, and their pros and cons may or may not outweigh each other.

But you are verifiably wrong to claim that there are no reasons to vote no. Opposing race-based legislation in all its forms is a very valid position, and the only non-racist position possible to take in this.

There was absolutely no reason to vote no to this.

Of course there was. Enshrining different rights to different people in the constitution based on their race, is fundamentally objectionable.

it was invented to be a financial transaction tool

Which it failed at

So the same shit as here, except for the “look at how bad Reddit is now” posts?

I didn’t write a single positive word about crypto. I even changed “spam” to “scam”.

I am salty at people hating on reddit with tailored examples to “prove” how shit it has become. It’s basically people trying to tell themselves that things are much better here, and reddit has turned to shit since they left. My guess is that they actually think the content here is kinda sparse, so they need to keep telling themselves they did the right thing.

What a fucking disingenuous post. I can go to reddit now, and most rising posts are about things that interest me, because i subscribe to subreddits that match my interests. If you subscribe to Crypto scam subreddits, you can’t go here and whine about it. Curate your timeline, just like you need to do here.

I’m so sick off all the FUD about reddit. Yes, the reddit management are basically pure evil, I agree. But reddit itself was barely affected by the exodus.

https://decrypt.co/31522/crypto-brave-browser-redirect

Brave are lying scum and crypto bros.