You’re thinking of BD-R: BD-RE can be rewritten/erased hundreds of times
I sometimes admin. But usually not.
You’re thinking of BD-R: BD-RE can be rewritten/erased hundreds of times
If the GOP wanted to counterattack, they could always start funding hyper-progressive candidates too 🙂
The FDA regulation on Net Weight is found in 21 CFR 101.105. In this regulation FDA makes allowance for reasonable variations caused by loss or gain of moisture during the course of good distribution practice or by unavoidable deviations in good manufacturing practice. FDA states that variations from the stated quantity of contents should not be unreasonably large.
While FDA does not provide a specific allowable tolerance for Net Weight, this matter could come under FTC jurisdiction. FTC has proposed regulations that would unify USDA and FDA Net Contents labeling and incorporate information found in the National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) Handbook 133.
NIST Handbook 133 specifies that the average net quantity of contents in a lot must at least equal the net quantity declared on the label. Plus or minus deviation is permitted when caused by unavoidable variation in weighing and measuring that occur in good manufacturing practice. The maximum allowable variance for a package with a net weight declaration of 5 oz is 5/16 oz. Packages under-filled by more than this amount are considered non-compliant.
An API token is more secure than a password by virtue of it not needing to be typed in by a human. Phishing, writing down passwords, and the fact that API tokens can have restricted scopes all make them more secure.
Expiration on its own doesn’t make it more secure, but it can if it’s in the context of loading the token onto a system that you might lose track of/not have access to in the future.
Individual API tokens can also be revoked without revoking all of them, unlike a password where changing it means you have to re-login everywhere.
And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Lmk if you have questions, though.
go fmt has been a thing for almost 11 years
Hey, I maintain a highly popular (if niche) FOSS library. Where the fuck is my big tech paycheck where they bribe me into integrating with their product?
/s Silly take IMO, relies on cherry-picking popular FOSS projects where you can see “the influence” of big tech, AND then No True Scotsman your way into saying that they’re not allowed to participate in the development/influence of FOSS because… checks notes they’re the ones funding the project/putting money in front of otherwise unpaid volunteers?
If you end up coming up with a better scheme for things that has the actual practical effect of compensating devs appropriately (yes, that means at current market rates or better) for their work, then please let us know so we can switch to doing that immediately. I will literally do anything you suggest if it would achieve that end.
Absolutely fucking me_irl
That’s only for a single service, not really what OP seems to be asking for
Fuck’s sake, people. Gitlab already didn’t allow search unless you were logged in.
This ain’t enshittification.
Depending on whether this code is in a hotpath (and considering how “elementary” it is, I figure that’s a possibility), this could very well be a significant speed improvement.
Though I’d say that only excuses it if it’s truly an elementary function (and not one line as part of a larger function), as otherwise it’s unreadable garbage. But on its own it:
From the top of this thread, Valve was suggested as a candidate for someone who might already be interested in these things, perhaps to the point of invested into each of those.
Or maybe they don’t. Maybe nobody does.
People can speculate and dream. Nobody’s speaking authoritatively here, and certainly nobody is petitioning that Linus himself get down and dirty in anti-cheat functionality.
Or here’s a revolutionary thought: let people voluntarily (and reversably) opt-in to kernel-level anti-cheats.
Part of freedom is the freedom to choose.
It’s prefectly reasonable to say “I have that site bookmarked”.
Then go to “I should have that site bookmarked”.
“I’ll check on that one site I should have bookmarked”
Etc.
I actually bought the second edition of Mastering Nim paperback the other day! Should be arriving tomorrow, hopefully.
I had fun dogfooding my interview problem in it, I feel like it’s basically step forward as far as modern syntaxes go.
Speaking for myself, I greatly appreciate the fact that it was moved to Github because 99% of all open source projects I’ve ever wanted to contribute to in the past have all been on Github. Kbin (and alexapy, on gitlab) have been the only exceptions.
And that’s not even mentioning my work also uses Github for our internal repos.
Speaking purely selfishly, it’s simply more convenient to be able to manage and track my time and contributions all in a single place, and I can’t imagine I’m alone. I’m looking forward to seeing Codeberg’s long-term goals of federation see fruit, but for right now it was simply an obnoxious extra hurdle.
Ernest has some big life stuff going on right now (you can check out his posts if you really need to know), and hasn’t been able to review/merge in PRs for kbin lately. Furthermore, kbin.social doesn’t even have the latest changes that are merged in, so the community fork mbin was made by @melroy, one of the most prolific contributors to kbin.
Unfortunately if you let Junior play in legacy code once, it’ll learn some nasty habits and make more of it from scratch, usually when you’re trying to sleep.
If you looked at the original github link, you’ll see that it has
libadwaita
(and naturally, gtk4) as a dependency.This isn’t fragmenting anything, and
adwaita
already has good documentation. This is just another binding for another language, not a whole new implementation.