Clearly they gave every last fuck they could about that code.

And here we see Professor Moonmoon about to espouse his latest theories on goodboi theory.

Scientific reproduction, as in reproduction of a study XD

Scientific reproduction, not sexual reproduction XD

So, hear me out here, there is a huge reproduction crisis out there. In theory, you could try to replicate this study without the researcher being an asshole and see if it still works out and this would be a valuable line of research that could technically get funded.

I’m going to need a decent ship, some volunteers, and a 101 day supply of daiquiris.

Edit: (For clarity - this is scientific reproduction, not human reproduction)

Fair play to you - it just comes off that way.

Each post that hits my feed makes me think “wow, sexism is alive and well”. Glad to hear it isn’t just all rage bait.

Eh, I only ever see that community when a bait post makes it to the front page.

Honestly, I just assumed it was a really elaborate troll group and didn’t bother engaging.

When you’re young you experience the world, when you get older you keep the world working for the young to experience it, and when you’re old you wish you’d made it work better so you could’ve really experienced it.

Snake with a hundred mage hands who is actually a detective called “dick-long”?

Microtransactions - the answer always has been and always will be microtransactions.

Not so much in London, and usually you need to pay for the public ones.

So the traditional answer here is to ask them to point at the door the other guard will say is safe.

However, I’m curious, does anyone know of any other valid solutions?

We live in but a bright second, yet are determined to fill it with darkness unending.

"Mom can I have dragon?

“No, we have dragon at home.”

The three pathways for most academics

Option 1 - shit out a large pile of bad (either misleading, over-sensationalised, or just clearly partial work) papers, but get funding to do the same for another year.

Option 2 - work hard to create a quality paper, run out of time, no more funding, off you go to industry.

Option 3 - take a teaching intensive role and never have any time for research, oh and also get paid less than in industry.

Sane => Worry Google is a threat

Worry Google is a threat =/> Sane

"Google, however, has decided anonymity is too risky. "

The rest of the sane universe appear to be deciding Google is too risky.

Ehh…

So, it’s more a case that the system cannot prove it’s own consistency (a system cannot prove it won’t lead to a contradiction). So the proof is valid within the system, but the validity of the system is what was considered suspect (i.e. we cannot prove it won’t produce a contradiction from that system alone).

These days we use relative consistency proofs - that is we assume system A is consistent and model system B in it thus giving “If A is consistent, then so too must B”.

As much as I hate to admit it, classical set theory has been fairly robust - though intuitionistic logic makes better philosophical sense. Fortunately both are equiconsistent (each can be used to imply the consistency of the other).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2mvT1ddiBc

Alas, the game itself was long ago murdered.

I’m doing a stats intro class this week - new funny star just dropped!